Literature DB >> 16022056

Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift?

Sara Ahmed1, Nancy E Mayo, Marc Corbiere, Sharon Wood-Dauphinee, James Hanley, Robin Cohen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: In many studies, assessments of change in self-report measures such as health-related quality of life must account for potential response shift, including reconceptualization and changes in internal standards of measurement.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare healthy controls and individuals with stroke on the extent to which changes in internal standards and reconceptualization of health related quality of life (HRQL) occurs over the first 6 months post-stroke.
METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess invariance of the SF-36 measurement model over time among 238 individuals with stroke and 392 controls, separately. This procedure assessed changes over time in the factor loadings, variances, and covariances of responses, and compared the extent of change between individuals with stroke and those in the control group. In addition a multisample comparison was made between individuals with stroke and members of the control group at the first evaluation in order to assess invariance of the SF-36 measurement model between the groups. The controls were considered to be a 'proxy' for the stroke cohort prior to the stroke.
RESULTS: We found no evidence of reconceptualization and changes in internal standards over time when the groups were assessed separately. There was a significant difference in the factor covariances (reconceptualization) between the two groups at the time of the first evaluation. However, measurement error was also significant for this comparison.
CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the improvement in HRQL over time is real rather than a result of reconceptualization or a recalibration. If response shift does occur with stroke it is likely to be mediated by the event itself and not the recovery process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022056     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-3708-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  45 in total

1.  Response shift and adaptation in chronically ill patients.

Authors:  D Postulart; E M Adang
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale.

Authors:  L S Williams; M Weinberger; L E Harris; D O Clark; J Biller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index.

Authors:  S C Loewen; B A Anderson
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-07

4.  ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes.

Authors:  G E Gresham; T F Phillips; M L Labi
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group.

Authors:  W M Hopman; T Towheed; T Anastassiades; A Tenenhouse; S Poliquin; C Berger; L Joseph; J P Brown; T M Murray; J D Adachi; D A Hanley; E Papadimitropoulos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  How do scores on the EuroQol relate to scores on the SF-36 after stroke?

Authors:  P J Dorman; M Dennis; P Sandercock
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.

Authors:  P W Duncan; D Wallace; S M Lai; D Johnson; S Embretson; L J Laster
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  A comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke.

Authors:  I Wellwood; M S Dennis; C P Warlow
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 10.668

9.  Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel index measures.

Authors:  C V Granger; L S Dewis; N C Peters; C C Sherwood; J E Barrett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 3.966

10.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study.

Authors:  H S Jørgensen; H Nakayama; H O Raaschou; J Vive-Larsen; M Støier; T S Olsen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  33 in total

1.  Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  T S Dabakuyo; F Guillemin; T Conroy; M Velten; D Jolly; M Mercier; S Causeret; J Cuisenier; O Graesslin; M Gauthier; F Bonnetain
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Response to Donaldson's commentary.

Authors:  Sarah Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Structural equation models for quality of life response shifts: promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Gary W Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Rita Bode; Nicholas Repucci; Janine Becker; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities.

Authors:  Ruth Barclay-Goddard; Joshua D Epstein; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Guidelines for improving the stringency of response shift research using the thentest.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Longitudinal factorial invariance of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales child self-report Version: one year prospective evidence from the California State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP).

Authors:  James W Varni; Christine A Limbers; Daniel A Newman; Michael Seid
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Quality of Life and Value Assessment in Health Care.

Authors:  Alicia Hall
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2020-03

9.  Guidelines for secondary analysis in search of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Sara Ahmed; Richard Sawatzky; Tolulope Sajobi; Nancy Mayo; Joel Finkelstein; Lisa Lix; Mathilde G E Verdam; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Susan C Scott; Nandini Dendukuri; Sara Ahmed; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.