Literature DB >> 16119222

Measurement properties of a new quality of life measure for patients with work disability associated with musculoskeletal pain.

M F Coutu1, M J Durand, P Loisel, G Dupuis, S Gervais.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Quality of Life Systemic Inventory (QLSI) measures patients' goal attainment based on the system control theory. It quantifies the perceived impact of the disorder and the gap between the present and aspired states.
PURPOSE: To evaluate concurrent validity and responsiveness of the QLSI among workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).
METHODS: Participants (10 women; 29 men) were recruited at a work rehabilitation centre and had more than 4 weeks of absence from work due to MSDs compensated by the Workers' Compensation Board. Concurrent validity and external responsiveness were based on baseline and post-treatment measures of external criteria. Criteria and related instruments were the following: perception of disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire); health-related quality of life (SF-12); stress (Psychological Stress Measure) and distress (Psychological Distress Index).
RESULTS: Regression analyses revealed significant correlations between QLSI scores and the Psychological Distress Index (r2 = .11 to .19 and .66; p < .001), with either the SF-12 mental component scale (r2 = .18 and .11; p < .01) or the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (r2 = .04 and .10; p < .05). All measures showed highly significant change over time.
CONCLUSION: Results support the concurrent validity and responsiveness of the QLSI, with an MSD population. SIGNIFICANCE: This instrument could serve in future research as an outcome measurement instrument in the evaluation of more long-term effects of rehabilitation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119222     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-005-5938-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  41 in total

Review 1.  Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research.

Authors:  M Von Korff; M P Jensen; P Karoly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations.

Authors:  J A Husted; R J Cook; V T Farewell; D D Gladman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.

Authors:  M P Jensen; J A Turner; J M Romano; L D Fisher
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

4.  On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation.

Authors:  C B Terwee; F W Dekker; W M Wiersinga; M F Prummel; P M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Predicting long-term functional limitations among back pain patients in primary care settings.

Authors:  C E Dionne; T D Koepsell; M Von Korff; R A Deyo; W E Barlow; H Checkoway
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 7.  Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores.

Authors:  P W Stratford; J M Binkley; D L Riddle
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1996-10

8.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

Review 9.  Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy.

Authors:  M Farquhar
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  Responsiveness of pain, disability, and physical impairment outcomes in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Kathryn M Refshauge; Chris G Maher
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  5 in total

1.  Psychometric Properties of the Obstacles to Return-to-Work Questionnaire in a Brazilian context.

Authors:  Daniela Milani; Neusa Maria Costa Alexandre; Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-12

2.  Upper-extremity musculoskeletal symptoms and physical health related quality of life among women employed in poultry processing and other low-wage jobs in northeastern North Carolina.

Authors:  C S McPhee; H J Lipscomb
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.214

3.  Subjective quality of life according to work status following interdisciplinary work rehabilitation consequent to musculoskeletal disability.

Authors:  Carmen E Moliner; Marie-José Durand; Johanne Desrosiers; Marie-France Coutu
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-02

4.  Effects of Chronic Illness on the Quality of Life in Psychiatric out patients of the Iraq - Iran War.

Authors:  Khodabakhsh Ahmadi; Shahriar Shahidi; Vahid Nejati; Gholamreza Karami; Mehdi Masoomi
Journal:  Iran J Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03

5.  Level of distress among workers undergoing work rehabilitation for musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Marie-José Durand; Patrick Loisel; Claudine Goulet; Nathalie Gauthier
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-05-09
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.