Literature DB >> 9210854

Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects.

M W Short1, J H Cauraugh.   

Abstract

A recent emphasis in motor control research is the planning of macroscopic features and how variables such as efficiency and comfort influence the planning process. This paper extends the work by Rosenbaum and Jorgensen (1992) by further studying the end-state comfort effect. In the first experiment, participants picked up a dowel using an underhand or overhand grip and touched one end to a numbered target on the wall. The height of the #9 target was set at the height of participants' right shoulder. The second experiment involved awkwardness ratings. Participants touched the 14 targets with the dowel as well as with a small dumbbell and the comfort of the end position was rated on a seven-point scale. In the third experiment, participants moved a dumbbell to the targets in the same procedure as the first experiment. Overall, the probability analyses indicated that as the end-state comfort effect was magnified, the sequential effect vanished and a distinct point-of-change effect appeared. Optimization theory and the knowledge model readily explained the phenomena of the end-state comfort effect, the sequential effect, and the point-of-change effect. The present findings indicate that comfort has a powerful influence on the planning of motor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9210854     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(97)00006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  17 in total

1.  Representation of grasp postures and anticipatory motor planning in children.

Authors:  Tino Stöckel; Charmayne M L Hughes; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Marcel Mutsaarts; Bert Steenbergen; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric lateralization does not affect the cognitive and mechanical cost of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Human posterior parietal cortex mediates hand-specific planning.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Perseveration effects in reaching and grasping rely on motor priming and not perception.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cognitive costs of motor planning do not differ between pointing and grasping in a sequential task.

Authors:  Christoph Schütz; Matthias Weigelt; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Planning for manual positioning: the end-state comfort effect for manual abduction-adduction.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A detailed analysis of the planning and execution of prehension movements by three adolescents with spastic hemiparesis due to cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Marcel Mutsaarts; Bert Steenbergen; Ruud Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.