Literature DB >> 9209962

Magnetocardiography and 32-lead potential mapping: repolarization in normal subjects during pharmacologically induced stress.

K Brockmeier1, L Schmitz, J D Bobadilla Chavez, M Burghoff, H Koch, R Zimmermann, L Trahms.   

Abstract

Signals from 37 magnetocardiographic sensors and simultaneously recorded 32 ECG leads were obtained in three healthy male subjects (including two reinvestigations). After recordings at rest, the heart rate was increased by pharmacologic stress (117 to 142 beats/min). Comparison of the repolarization of rest and stress showed substantial changes in the magnetocardiogram (MCG) up to T wave inversions during stress. In the ECG only junctional ST-T segment shifts were present. For quantification, correlation coefficients between pairs of rest and stress MCG and rest and stress ECG distributions were calculated for the same time instant at the beginning of T wave under rest and stress conditions. In addition, equivalent electrical current dipole moment and magnetic dipole moment vectors were calculated from the MCG, and their change from rest to stress evaluated. Correlation coefficients for MCG comparison ranged from 0.3 to 0.5; ECG comparison suggested much less change from stress, ranging from 0.7 to 1.0. Current dipole moment changes at T wave onset were marginal; in contrast, the magnetic dipole moment changed substantially. Since the magnetic dipole reflects vortex currents, changes in its intensity and/or orientation during repolarization suggest this as the biophysical basis of the striking difference in the response of the MCG and ECG to pharmacologic stress. Normal ECG findings at rest and under stress in healthy subjects support the conclusion that the repolarization changes in the MCG were of nonpathologic origin.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9209962     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb01824.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  10 in total

1.  Measurements of transmembrane potential and magnetic field at the apex of the heart.

Authors:  Krista Kay McBride; Bradley J Roth; V Y Sidorov; John P Wikswo; Franz J Baudenbacher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Magnetocardiographic assessment of healed myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Helena Hänninen; Miia Holmström; Paula Vesterinen; Milla Karvonen; Heikki Väänänen; Lasse Oikarinen; Markku Mäkijärvi; Jukka Nenonen; Kirsi Lauerma; Toivo Katila; Lauri Toivonen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Noise reduction in magnetocardiography by singular value decomposition and independent component analysis.

Authors:  D DiPietroPaolo; H-P Müller; G Nolte; S N Erné
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Has magnetocardiography a clinical future?

Authors:  H D Esperer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-09

5.  [Has the magnetocardiography a clinical future?].

Authors:  H D Esperer
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-09

6.  Unshielded magnetocardiography: Repeatability and reproducibility of automatically estimated ventricular repolarization parameters in 204 healthy subjects.

Authors:  Anna Rita Sorbo; Gianmarco Lombardi; Lara La Brocca; Gianluigi Guida; Riccardo Fenici; Donatella Brisinda
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  A method for detecting myocardial abnormality by using a current-ratio map calculated from an exercise-induced magnetocardiogram.

Authors:  A Kandori; H Kanzaki; K Miyatake; S Hashimoto; S Itoh; N Tanaka; T Miyashita; K Tsukada
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Identification of post-myocardial infarction patients with ventricular tachycardia by time-domain intra-QRS analysis of signal-averaged electrocardiogram and magnetocardiogram.

Authors:  P Endt; J Montonen; M Mäkijärvi; J Nenonen; U Steinhoff; L Trahms; T Katila
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.602

9.  Source localization for gastric electrical activity using simulated magnetogastrographic data.

Authors:  Recep Avci; Niranchan Paskaranandavadivel; Stefan Calder; Peng Du; Leonard A Bradshaw; Leo K Cheng
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

10.  Multistage Classification of Current Density Distribution Maps of Various Heart States Based on Correlation Analysis and k-NN Algorithm.

Authors:  Yevhenii Udovychenko; Anton Popov; Illya Chaikovsky
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-12-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.