Literature DB >> 36245824

Lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.

Yuma Wada1, Masaaki Nishi1, Kozo Yoshikawa1, Chie Takasu1, Takuya Tokunaga1, Toshihiro Nakao1, Hideya Kashihara1, Toshiaki Yoshimoto1, Mitsuo Shimada1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have revealed the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery for clinical stage III gastric cancer (GC). The tumor volume at the primary tumor site (PT) is sometimes difficult to measure because of the luminal structure; therefore, evaluation of the lymph node (LN) response to NAC may help to more accurately predict survival outcomes. The present study therefore evaluated the LN response to NAC for prediction of survival outcomes in patients with GC. The study involved 160 patients with clinical stage III GC who underwent NAC (n=14) and upfront surgery (n=146). PT and LN responses to NAC were evaluated, various clinicopathological factors were evaluated and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to determine survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between patients who underwent NAC and those who underwent upfront surgery (OS, P=0.71; DFS, P=0.50). However, although there were no significant differences in PT responses, patients classified as LN non-responders to NAC had a significantly worse prognosis compared with patients classified as LN responders in terms of DFS (PT, P=0.93; LN, P<0.01) and OS (PT, P=0.84; LN, P<0.01). Moreover, a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio tended to be associated with poor DFS [univariate: hazard ratio (HR)=4.23, P=0.06; multivariate: HR=6.45, P=0.04]. Finally, an LN response to NAC was significantly better for prediction of recurrence (univariate, HR=7.79, 95% confidence interval=1.16-63.51, P=0.02; multivariate, HR=7.44, P=0.01). Overall, the current study revealed the clinical importance of the LN response to NAC for predicting survival outcomes in patients with GC. These findings highlight the potential clinical impact of optimizing treatment strategies to improve the selection and management of patients.
Copyright © 2022, Spandidos Publications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastric cancer; lymph node; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; response prediction marker

Year:  2022        PMID: 36245824      PMCID: PMC9554956          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   3.111


  44 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Metastatic gastric lymph node rate is a significant prognostic factor for resectable stage IV stomach cancer.

Authors:  Y Kodera; Y Yamamura; Y Shimizu; A Torii; T Hirai; K Yasui; T Morimoto; T Kato; T Kito
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  T Waddell; M Verheij; W Allum; D Cunningham; A Cervantes; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer.

Authors:  Mitsuru Sasako; Shinichi Sakuramoto; Hitoshi Katai; Taira Kinoshita; Hiroshi Furukawa; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Atsushi Nashimoto; Masashi Fujii; Toshifusa Nakajima; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Long-term survival outcomes of advanced gastric cancer patients who achieved a pathological complete response with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Haruhiko Cho; Junichi Nakamura; Yoshihide Asaumi; Hiroshi Yabusaki; Masahiro Sakon; Naoki Takasu; Tatsunori Kobayashi; Taro Aoki; Osamu Shiraishi; Hirofumi Kishimoto; Souya Nunobe; Shinji Yanagisawa; Takeshi Suda; Shigeyuki Ueshima; Satoru Matono; Hiroshi Maruyama; Mitsutoshi Tatsumi; Tomoko Seya; Yutaka Tanizawa; Takaki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.

Authors:  Hyuna Sung; Jacques Ferlay; Rebecca L Siegel; Mathieu Laversanne; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Ahmedin Jemal; Freddie Bray
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  MSI and EBV Positive Gastric Cancer's Subgroups and Their Link With Novel Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Rodriquenz; Giandomenico Roviello; Alberto D'Angelo; Daniele Lavacchi; Franco Roviello; Karol Polom
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Prognostic Nutritional Index as an independent prognostic factor in locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Gema Bruixola; Javier Caballero; Federica Papaccio; Angelica Petrillo; Aina Iranzo; Miguel Civera; Miriam Moriana; Neus Bosch; Maria Maroñas; Ines González; Miguel Pastor; Andrés Cervantes
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-10-24

9.  The role of prognostic nutritional index for clinical outcomes of gastric cancer after total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Zhu Xishan; Zhao Ye; Ma Feiyan; Xuan Liang; Wu Shikai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prognostic significance of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio and platelet lymphocyte ratio in advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX chemotherapy.

Authors:  Suee Lee; Sung Yong Oh; Sung Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Lee; Min Chan Kim; Ki Han Kim; Hyo-Jin Kim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.