Literature DB >> 18461821

Outcomes of second revascularization procedures after stent implantation.

Richard P Konstance1, Eric L Eisenstein, Kevin J Anstrom, Linda K Shaw, Robert M Califf, Robert A Harrington, David B Matchar, Kevin A Schulman, David F Kong.   

Abstract

Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce subsequent revascularization procedures. Although randomized trials have compared DES to brachytherapy and balloon angioplasty (PTCA) for in-stent restenosis, few long-term comparisons have been made to bare metal stents (BMS) or bypass surgery (CABG), particularly following second procedures. We sought to assess the association between revascularization modality and long-term clinical outcomes of patients receiving a second procedure for coronary artery disease. Between January 2000 and July 2005, 4,666 consecutive patients underwent initial coronary stent implantation (DES or BMS). From this population we identified 569 patients undergoing a second target vessel revascularization (DES, BMS, PTCA or CABG). Outcomes were assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after the second procedure, with follow-up through September 2006. Adjusted cumulative incidence rates were calculated using inverse probability weighted estimators. We found that at 24 months, there were no significant differences in death or myocardial infarction for PTCA, BMS, DES, and CABG (17.7%, 14.9%, 7.5%, and 10.2%, p = 0.26[3dfl]). DES patients had lower rates of death or myocardial infarction or third target vessel procedures than patients receiving PTCA (14.6% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.01) and BMS (14.6% vs. 42.2%, p < 0.01), but rates similar to CABG patients (14.6% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.99). For patients undergoing a second revascularization procedure, PTCA, BMS, DES, and CABG are associated with a similar risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. DES and CABG are associated with lower rates of third revascularization procedures compared to PTCA and BMS. Further studies are needed to determine the optimum application for CABG vs. DES as a second or third revascularization procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18461821     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-007-9120-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  36 in total

1.  Utilizing propensity scores to estimate causal treatment effects with censored time-lagged data.

Authors:  K J Anstrom; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Andrew T L Ong; Lex A van Herwerden; J Eduardo Sousa; Adib Jatene; Johannes J R M Bonnier; Jacques P M A Schönberger; Nigel Buller; Robert Bonser; Clemens Disco; Bianca Backx; Paul G Hugenholtz; Brian G Firth; Felix Unger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Characterizing the spectrum of in-stent restenosis: implications for contemporary treatment.

Authors:  Gordon E Pate; May Lee; Karin Humphries; Eric Cohen; Robert Lowe; Rebecca S Fox; Robert Teskey; Christopher E Buller
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 4.  Coronary-artery stents.

Authors:  Patrick W Serruys; Michael J B Kutryk; Andrew T L Ong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clopidogrel use and long-term clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation.

Authors:  Eric L Eisenstein; Kevin J Anstrom; David F Kong; Linda K Shaw; Robert H Tuttle; Daniel B Mark; Judith M Kramer; Robert A Harrington; David B Matchar; David E Kandzari; Eric D Peterson; Kevin A Schulman; Robert M Califf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The way of the future redux.

Authors:  D F Fortin; R M Califf; D B Pryor; D B Mark
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in Sweden.

Authors:  Bo Lagerqvist; Stefan K James; Ulf Stenestrand; Johan Lindbäck; Tage Nilsson; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of sirolimus versus paclitaxel eluting stents for treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Flavio Airoldi; Carlo Briguori; Ioannis Iakovou; Goran Stankovic; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Mauro Carlino; Alaide Chieffo; Matteo Montorfano; John Cosgrave; Iassen Michev; Renata Rogacka; Giuseppe Massimo Sangiorgi; Antonio Colombo
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Sirolimus-eluting stents vs vascular brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis within bare-metal stents: the SISR randomized trial.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Paul Teirstein; Lowell Satler; Michael Sketch; James O'Malley; Jeffery J Popma; Richard E Kuntz; Peter J Fitzgerald; Hong Wang; Eileen Caramanica; Sidney A Cohen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-03-12       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  A R Grüntzig; A Senning; W E Siegenthaler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-07-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness modelling of percutaneous coronary interventions in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ariel Beresniak; Thibaut Caruba; Brigitte Sabatier; Yves Juillière; Olivier Dubourg; Nicolas Danchin
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.