Literature DB >> 26329795

Does periacetabular osteotomy have depth-related effects on the articular cartilage of the hip?

Andreas M Hingsammer1, Patricia E Miller1, Michael B Millis1, Young-Jo Kim2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis may result from abnormal mechanics leading to biochemically mediated degradation of cartilage. In a dysplastic hip, the periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is designed to normalize the mechanics and our initial analysis suggests that it may also alter the cartilage biochemical composition. Articular cartilage structure and biology vary with the depth from the articular surface including the concentration of glycosaminoglycans (GAG), which are the charge macromolecules that are rapidly turned over and are lost in early osteoarthritis. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) enables noninvasive measurement of cartilage GAG content. The dGEMRIC index represents an indirect measure of GAG concentration with lower values indicating less GAG content. GAG content can normally vary with mechanical loading; however, progressive loss of GAG is associated with osteoarthritis. By looking at the changes in amounts of GAG in response to a PAO at different depths of cartilage, we may gain further insights into the types of biologic events that are occurring in the joint after a PAO. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We (1) measured the GAG content in the superficial and deep zones for the entire joint before and after PAO; and (2) investigated if the changes in the superficial and deep zone GAG content after PAO varied with different locations within the joint.
METHODS: This prospective study included 37 hips in 37 patients (mean age 26 ± 9 years) who were treated with periacetabular osteotomy for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia and had preoperative and 1-year follow up dGEMRIC scans. Twenty-eight of the 37 also had 2-year scans. Patients were eligible if they had symptomatic acetabular dysplasia with lateral center-edge angle < 20° and no or minimal osteoarthritis. The change in dGEMRIC after surgery was assessed in the superficial and deep cartilage zones at five acetabular radial planes.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD dGEMRIC index in the superficial zone fell from 480 ± 137 msec preoperatively to 409 ± 119 msec at Year 1 (95% confidence interval [CI], -87 to -54; p < 0.001) and recovered to 451 ± 115 msec at Year 2 (95% CI, 34-65; p < 0.001), suggesting that there is a transient event that causes the biologically sensitive superficial layer to lose GAG. In the deep acetabular cartilage zone, dGEMRIC index fell from 527 ± 148 msec preoperatively to 468 ± 143 msec at Year 1 (95% CI, -66 to -30; p < 0.001) and recovered to 494 ± 125 msec at Year 2 (95% CI, 5-32; p = 0.008). When each acetabular radial plane was looked at separately, the change from before surgery to 1 year after was confined to zones around the superior part of the joint. The only significant change from 1 to 2 years was an increase in the superficial layer of the superior zone (1 year 374 ± 123 msec, 2 year 453 ± 117 msec, p < 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PAO may alter the GAG content of the articular cartilage with a greater effect on the superficial zone compared with the deeper acetabular cartilage zone, especially at the superior aspect of the joint. Some surgeons have observed that surgery itself can be a stressor that can accelerate joint degeneration. Perhaps the decrease in dGEMRIC index seen in the superficial layer may be a catabolic response to postsurgical inflammation given that some recovery was seen at 2 years. The decrease in dGEMRIC index in the deep layer seen mainly near the superior part of the joint is persistent and may represent a response of articular cartilage to normalization of increased mechanical load seen in this region after osteotomy, which may be a normal response to alteration in loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study looks at the biochemical changes in the articular cartilage before and after a PAO for dysplastic hips using MRI in a similar manner to using histological methods to study alterations in articular cartilage with mechanical loading. Although PAO alters alignment and orientation of the acetabulum, its effects on cartilage biology are not clear. dGEMRIC provides a noninvasive method of assessing these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26329795      PMCID: PMC4626520          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4545-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  44 in total

1.  Effects of mechanical load on cartilage matrix biosynthesis in vitro.

Authors:  T Larsson; R M Aspden; D Heinegård
Journal:  Matrix       Date:  1991-12

2.  A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  R Ganz; K Klaue; T S Vinh; J W Mast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Effect of compressive loading and unloading on the synthesis of total protein, proteoglycan, and fibronectin by canine cartilage explants.

Authors:  N Burton-Wurster; M Vernier-Singer; T Farquhar; G Lust
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Zone-specific cell biosynthetic activity in mature bovine articular cartilage: a new method using confocal microscopic stereology and quantitative autoradiography.

Authors:  M Wong; P Wuethrich; P Eggli; E Hunziker
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  A novel proteoglycan synthesized and secreted by chondrocytes of the superficial zone of articular cartilage.

Authors:  B L Schumacher; J A Block; T M Schmid; M B Aydelotte; K E Kuettner
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 4.013

6.  Tensile properties of human knee joint cartilage: I. Influence of ionic conditions, weight bearing, and fibrillation on the tensile modulus.

Authors:  S Akizuki; V C Mow; F Müller; J C Pita; D S Howell; D H Manicourt
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Articular cartilage: correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR imaging.

Authors:  J M Modl; L A Sether; V M Haughton; J B Kneeland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  The superficial layer of human articular cartilage is more susceptible to interleukin-1-induced damage than the deeper layers.

Authors:  H J Hauselmann; J Flechtenmacher; L Michal; E J Thonar; M Shinmei; K E Kuettner; M B Aydelotte
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1996-03

9.  Local stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis in articular cartilage explants by dynamic compression in vitro.

Authors:  J J Parkkinen; M J Lammi; H J Helminen; M Tammi
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Softening of canine articular cartilage after immobilization of the knee joint.

Authors:  J Jurvelin; I Kiviranta; M Tammi; J H Helminen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

1.  How Does the dGEMRIC Index Change After Surgical Treatment for FAI? A Prospective Controlled Study: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Pascal C Haefeli; Markus S Hanke; Emanuel F Liechti; Stefan F Werlen; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Automatic MRI-based Three-dimensional Models of Hip Cartilage Provide Improved Morphologic and Biochemical Analysis.

Authors:  Florian Schmaranzer; Ronja Helfenstein; Guodong Zeng; Till D Lerch; Eduardo N Novais; James D Wylie; Young-Jo Kim; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Guoyan Zheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Changes in Muscle Volume and Composition After Treatment of Hip Dysplasia with Periacetabular Osteotomy.

Authors:  Nicholas I Bartschat; Nastaran Fatemi; Robert Westermann; John Davison; Jessica E Goetz; Amanda C Paulson; Michael C Willey
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021-12

Review 4.  [Recent research progress of hip-preserving treatment for adolescents and adults with developmental dysplasia of the hip].

Authors:  Jinyan Wu; Xiaodong Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 5.  Current and Future Advanced Imaging Modalities for the Diagnosis of Early Osteoarthritis of the Hip.

Authors:  Emily S Mills; Jacob A Becerra; Katie Yensen; Ioanna K Bolia; Edward C Shontz; Kareem J Kebaish; Andrew Dobitsch; Laith K Hasan; Aryan Haratian; Charlton D Ong; Jordan Gross; Frank A Petrigliano; Alexander E Weber
Journal:  Orthop Res Rev       Date:  2022-09-14

6.  Periacetabular osteotomy with or without arthroscopic management in patients with hip dysplasia: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Wilkin; Stéphane Poitras; John Clohisy; Etienne Belzile; Ira Zaltz; George Grammatopoulos; Gerd Melkus; Kawan Rakhra; Tim Ramsay; Kednapa Thavorn; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.279

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.