Literature DB >> 9198013

Optimal phosphor thickness for portal imaging.

J P Bissonnette1, I A Cunningham, P Munro.   

Abstract

A theoretical approach known as quantum accounting diagram (QAD) analysis has been used to calculate the spatial-frequency-dependent detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of two portal imaging systems: one based on a video camera and another based on an amorphous silicon array. The spatial frequency-dependent DQEs have then been used to determine indices of displayed and perceived image quality. These indices are figures of merit that can be used to optimize the design of linear imaging systems. We have used this approach to determine which of eight phosphor screen thicknesses (ranging between 67 and 947 mg/cm2) is optimal for the two designs of portal imaging systems. The physical characteristics (i.e., detection efficiencies, gains, and MTFs) of each of the eight x-ray detectors have been measured and combined with the physical characteristics of the remaining components to calculate the theoretical DQEs. In turn, the DQEs have been used to calculate theoretical indices of displayed and perceived image quality for two types of objects: a pelvis object and a pointlike object. The maximal indices of displayed and perceived image quality were obtained with screen thickness ranging between 358 and 947 mg/cm2, depending upon the imaging system design and the object being imaged. Importantly, the results showed that there is no single optimal screen thickness. The optimal thickness depended upon imaging task (e.g., detecting large, low-contrast structures, or detecting edges and small structures). Nevertheless, the results showed that there were only modest improvements in the indices of image quality for phosphor screens thicker than 350-400 mg/cm2.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9198013     DOI: 10.1118/1.598002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Performance evaluation of polycrystalline HgI2 photoconductors for radiation therapy imaging.

Authors:  Qihua Zhao; Larry E Antonuk; Youcef El-Mohri; Yi Wang; Hong Du; Amit Sawant; Zhong Su; Jin Yamamoto
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D noise transfer characteristics of flat-panel cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Daniel J Tward; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Noise aliasing and the 3D NEQ of flat-panel cone-beam CT: effect of 2D/3D apertures and sampling.

Authors:  Daniel J Tward; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A piecewise-focused high DQE detector for MV imaging.

Authors:  Josh Star-Lack; Daniel Shedlock; Dennis Swahn; Dave Humber; Adam Wang; Hayley Hirsh; George Zentai; Daren Sawkey; Isaac Kruger; Mingshan Sun; Eric Abel; Gary Virshup; Mihye Shin; Rebecca Fahrig
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Modelling the transport of optical photons in scintillation detectors for diagnostic and radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Emilie Roncali; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Aldo Badano
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Third party EPID with IGRT capability retrofitted onto an existing medical linear accelerator.

Authors:  D O Odero; D S Shimm
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2009-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.