Literature DB >> 9196343

Surgeons' follow-up practice after resection of colorectal cancer.

J Mella1, S N Datta, A Biffin, A G Radcliffe, R J Steele, J D Stamatakis.   

Abstract

Consultant surgeons in two United Kingdom Health Regions were invited to complete a questionnaire on details of their personal management of patients with colon and rectal cancer, with particular emphasis on follow-up. Replies from 140 (94%) were analysed by the surgeon's subspecialty of colorectal and gastrointestinal surgery (group 1) and all others (group 2). There was a wide variation in the duration of followup, but no difference between the two groups. More group 1 surgeons carried out investigations as a routine after colonic (P < 0.01) and rectal (P < 0.01) resection. Colonoscopy was used more frequently by group 1 (P < 0.0001) and barium enema by group 2 surgeons (P < 0.05). Investigations to detect asymptomatic metastases were used as a routine by 33.3% of surgeons, in whom there was no concordance over the choice or combination of tests and no difference between the two groups of surgeons. There is no consensus among surgeons as to the ideal duration, intensity and method of follow-up after resection for colorectal cancer and little difference between the practice of colorectal and gastrointestinal surgeons and that of other specialists, except in the use of colonoscopy and barium enema. These results reflect the continuing lack of evidence on which to base the follow-up of patients after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196343      PMCID: PMC2502904     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  Follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Design of a randomized study.

Authors:  O Kronborg; C Fenger; E Deichgräber; L Hansen
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1988

2.  Follow-up after colorectal cancer--current practice in Wales and south west England.

Authors:  M E Foster; J Hill; D J Leaper
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Hepatectomy for liver metastases.

Authors:  J Scheele
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Follow-up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J Ovaska; H Järvinen; H Kujari; I Perttilä; J P Mecklin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Current follow-up strategies after resection of colon cancer. Results of a survey of members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons.

Authors:  A M Vernava; W E Longo; K S Virgo; M A Coplin; T P Wade; F E Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  D J Bruinvels; A M Stiggelbout; J Kievit; H C van Houwelingen; J D Habbema; C J van de Velde
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Improved survival after colorectal cancer in patients complying with a postoperative endoscopic surveillance program.

Authors:  V F Eckardt; H Stamm; G Kanzler; G Bernhard
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 10.093

  7 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance of patients following surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Steven Gan; Katherine Wilson; Paul Hollington
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Survival Outcomes in Asymptomatic Patients With Normal Conventional Imaging but Raised Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels in Colorectal Cancer Following Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Imaging.

Authors:  Khurum Khan; Avani Athauda; Katharine Aitken; David Cunningham; David Watkins; Naureen Starling; Gary J Cook; Eleftheria Kalaitzaki; Ian Chau; Sheela Rao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  Decision analysis for the cost-effective management of recurrent colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K C Park; J Schwimmer; J E Shepherd; M E Phelps; J R Czernin; C Schiepers; S S Gambhir
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Matthias Egger; Mark P Saunders; Sarah T O'Dwyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

5.  Prognostic value of FDG PET-CT in suspected recurrence of colorectal carcinoma: survival outcomes of a 10-year follow-up : FDG PET in recurrent colorectal CA.

Authors:  Zeynep Gözde Özkan; Duygu Has Şimşek; Serkan Kuyumcu; Melis Oflas; Emine Göknur Işık; İzzet Doğan; Senem Karabulut; Yasemin Şanlı
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 2.668

6.  Cost effectiveness analysis of intensive versus conventional follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; David K Whynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

Review 7.  Studies using the anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody 105AD7 in patients with primary and advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Charles Maxwell-Armstrong
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Evaluation of a follow-up programme after curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Howell; H Wotherspoon; E Leen; T C Cooke; C S McArdle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Impact of postoperative complications after primary tumor resection on survival in patients with incurable stage IV colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yusuke Fujita; Koya Hida; Nobuaki Hoshino; Yoshiharu Sakai; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Akiyoshi Kanazawa; Michitoshi Goto; Shuji Saito; Tadashi Suda; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-01-25

10.  Should the surgeon or the general practitioner (GP) follow up patients after surgery for colon cancer? A randomized controlled trial protocol focusing on quality of life, cost-effectiveness and serious clinical events.

Authors:  Knut M Augestad; Barthold Vonen; Ranveig Aspevik; Torunn Nestvold; Unni Ringberg; Roar Johnsen; Jan Norum; Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.