Literature DB >> 9193014

Clinical predictors of transvenous defibrillation energy requirements.

K Khalighi1, B Daly, E V Leino, S R Shorofsky, N G Kavesh, R W Peters, M R Gold.   

Abstract

Nonthoracotomy and, more recently, transvenous lead systems have become routine for initial implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Previous studies of clinical predictors of nonthoracotomy defibrillation energy requirements evaluated multiple complex lead systems that included subcutaneous patches. However, the predictors of an adequate transvenous defibrillation threshold (DFT) have not been assessed previously. Accordingly, the present study is a prospective evaluation of DFT using a uniform testing protocol in 119 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation with a single transvenous lead. For each patient, 38 parameters were assessed including standard clinical, echocardiographic, and radiographic measures. An adequate monophasic DFT (< or =20 J) was achieved in 76% of patients. Multivariable analysis revealed 3 independent factors predictive of a high threshold: preoperative amiodarone use (odds ratio = 5.8, p < or =0.002), echocardiographic measures of left ventricular dilation (odds ratio = 0.47, p < or =0.005) and body size (odds ratio = 0.51, p < or =0.006). Patients receiving amiodarone who also had left ventricular dilation constitute a group at considerable (69%) risk for having a high DFT. In contrast, patients with neither of these risk factors have only an 11% chance of having a high threshold. We conclude that an adequate transvenous DFT can be predicted from simple clinical parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193014     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00702-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  10 in total

1.  [Is intraoperative ICD-testing still necessary?].

Authors:  C Mewis; H-R Neuberger; A Buob
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2010-06

2.  Differences between left and right ventricular chamber geometry affect cardiac vulnerability to electric shocks.

Authors:  Blanca Rodríguez; Li Li; James C Eason; Igor R Efimov; Natalia A Trayanova
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.367

3.  [Not Available].

Authors:  U Wolfhard; M Knocks; S Sack; F H Splittgerber; J B Fuchs; M Günnicker
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1998-02

4.  Incidence and clinical predictors of low defibrillation safety margin at time of implantable defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Zhongwei Cheng; Mintu Turakhia; Ronald Lo; Anurag Gupta; Paul C Zei; Henry H Hsia; Amin Al-Ahmad; Paul J Wang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Comparison of low-energy versus high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  How to Manage a High Defibrillation Threshold in ICD Patients: and Does it Really Matter?

Authors:  Maria Vittoria Matassini; Jeff S Healey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

7.  Enhanced transmural fiber rotation and connexin 43 heterogeneity are associated with an increased upper limit of vulnerability in a transgenic rabbit model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Crystal M Ripplinger; Wenwen Li; Jennifer Hadley; Junjie Chen; Florence Rothenberg; Raffaella Lombardi; Samuel A Wickline; Ali J Marian; Igor R Efimov
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Comparison of coronary venous defibrillation with conventional transvenous internal defibrillation in man.

Authors:  P R Roberts; J R Paisey; T R Betts; S Allen; T Whitman; M Bonner; J M Morgan
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Diego Jimenez Sanchez; Ignacio Fernández Lozano
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2018-08-12

10.  Incidence of ineffective safety margin testing (<10 J) and efficacy of routine subcutaneous array insertion during implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation.

Authors:  Marc-Alexander Ohlow; Marcus Roos; Bernward Lauer; J Christoph Geller
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.