Literature DB >> 9186212

Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients.

S Kobayashi1, N S Eftekhar, K Terayama, R P Joshi.   

Abstract

Ten- to 20-year (average, 14 years) results of primary Charnley low friction arthroplasties performed in patients 50 years of age or younger (55 sockets and 53 femoral prostheses) were compared with those in patients older than 50 years (273 sockets and 273 femoral prostheses). The incidence of radiologic loosening of the socket, including revision cases, was higher in the younger (29.1%) than in the older patients (14.3%). The revision rate for aseptic loosening of the socket was higher in the younger (20%) than in the older group (4%). This poor performance of the socket may be attributable to the higher incidences of rheumatoid diseases and accelerated polyethylene wear in the younger patients. In contrast, only 3.8% of the femoral prostheses were radiologically loose, and none of them were revised in the younger patients. These figures were comparable with those in the older patients. Quality of structure of bone available for implant fixation may be important for the durability of the arthroplasty. It was considered inferior on the acetabular side and better on the femoral side in the younger patients than in the older. Continued use of the cemented Charnley femoral prostheses can be justified in young patients, although further research is required for the socket problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9186212     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  10 in total

Review 1.  Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Authors:  Steven Cutts; Paul B Carter
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  The influence of clearance on friction, lubrication and squeaking in large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Authors:  Claire L Brockett; Phil Harper; Sophie Williams; Graham H Isaac; Rob S Dwyer-Joyce; Zhongmin Jin; John Fisher
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Luthfur Rahman; Sarah K Muirhead-Allwood; Muhannad Alkinj
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Evaluation of clinical outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients under 30 years of age.

Authors:  Mohsen Mardani-Kivi; Mahmoud Karimi-Mobarakeh; Kamran Asadi; Keyvan Hashemi-Motlagh; Khashayar Saheb-Ekhtiari
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-09-27

5.  High survivorship of cemented sockets with roof graft for severe acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Vincent J J F Busch; Nicholas D Clement; Philipp F J Mayer; Steffen J Breusch; Colin R Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 21 years: a minimum, 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Benoît J Bessette; François Fassier; Michael Tanzer; Caleb E Brooks
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Cemented polyethylene cups in patients younger than 40 years.

Authors:  Daniël C J de Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; Jan C M Hendriks; René P H Veth; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  The Exeter Universal hip in patients 50 years or younger at 10-17 years' followup.

Authors:  Simon C Lewthwaite; Ben Squires; Graham A Gie; Andrew J Timperley; Robin S M Ling
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A modified cementing technique using BoneSource to augment fixation of the acetabulum in a sheep model.

Authors:  A John Timperley; Iulian Nusem; Kathy Wilson; Sarah L Whitehouse; Pieter Buma; Ross W Crawford
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Return to sporting activity after Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: Mid term results.

Authors:  Nemandra Sandiford; S K Muirhead-Allwood; J A Skinner
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.251

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.