Literature DB >> 9184479

Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes.

L Osterhout1, M Bersick, J McLaughlin.   

Abstract

Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded while 14 males and 14 females read sentences containing a reflexive pronoun that referred to a definitionally or stereotypically male or female antecedent noun. Pronouns that disagreed with the gender definition or gender stereotype of the antecedent elicited a large-amplitude positive wave. Violations of gender definitions elicited a larger positive wave than did violations of gender stereotypes. Furthermore, the positive wave elicited by stereotype violations persisted even when subjects judged these sentences to be acceptable. Finally, female subjects exhibited larger positivities than did male subjects, regardless of whether the gender mismatch involved a definitional or stereotypical antecedent. These results are taken to indicate that ERPs are sensitive to violations of gender-based occupational stereotypes and that the ERP response to stereotype violations is similar to the P600 effect elicited by a variety of syntactic anomalies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184479     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and semantic aspects of language.

Authors:  T F Münte; H J Heinze; G R Mangun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: the costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.

Authors:  L A Rudman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-03

3.  On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability.

Authors:  C C Duncan-Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data.

Authors:  A D Friederici
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes.

Authors:  C M Judd; B Park
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing.

Authors:  L Osterhout; P J Holcomb; D A Swinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise?

Authors:  E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words.

Authors:  M Kutas; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  The impact of mothers' gender-role stereotypic beliefs on mothers' and children's ability perceptions.

Authors:  J E Jacobs; J S Eccles
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1992-12
View more
  44 in total

1.  Comprehending pronouns: a role for word-specific gender stereotype information.

Authors:  Shelia M Kennison; Jessie L Trofe
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-05

2.  ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension.

Authors:  Victoria A Kazmerski; Dawn G Blasko; Banchiamlack G Dessalegn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

3.  A new look at the syntax-discourse interface: the use of binding principles in sentence processing.

Authors:  Patrick Sturt
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-03

4.  Violating stereotypes: eye movements and comprehension processes when text conflicts with world knowledge.

Authors:  Susan A Duffy; Jessica A Keir
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-06

5.  Adaptation to Animacy Violations during Listening Comprehension.

Authors:  Megan A Boudewyn; Adam R Blalock; Debra L Long; Tamara Y Swaab
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  The fractionation of spoken language understanding by measuring electrical and magnetic brain signals.

Authors:  Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Immediate activation of stereotypical gender information.

Authors:  Jane Oakhill; Alan Garnham; David Reynolds
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

8.  Brain systems mediating semantic and syntactic processing in deaf native signers: biological invariance and modality specificity.

Authors:  Cheryl M Capek; Giordana Grossi; Aaron J Newman; Susan L McBurney; David Corina; Brigitte Roeder; Helen J Neville
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Authors:  Andres H Neuhaus; Carolin Opgen-Rhein; Carsten Urbanek; Melanie Gross; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Simone Koehler; Michael Dettling
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  When Proactivity Fails: An Electrophysiological Study of Establishing Reference in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Gina R Kuperberg; Tali Ditman; Arim Choi Perrachione
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2017-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.