Literature DB >> 19172632

Spatiotemporal mapping of sex differences during attentional processing.

Andres H Neuhaus1, Carolin Opgen-Rhein, Carsten Urbanek, Melanie Gross, Eric Hahn, Thi Minh Tam Ta, Simone Koehler, Michael Dettling.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies have increasingly aimed at approximating neural substrates of human cognitive sex differences elicited by visuospatial challenge. It has been suggested that females and males use different behaviorally relevant neurocognitive strategies. In females, greater right prefrontal cortex activation has been found in several studies. The spatiotemporal dynamics of neural events associated with these sex differences is still unclear. We studied 22 female and 22 male participants matched for age, education, and nicotine with 29-channel-electroencephalogram recorded under a visual selective attention paradigm, the Attention Network Test. Visual event-related potentials (ERP) were topographically analyzed and neuroelectric sources were estimated. In absence of behavioral differences, ERP analysis revealed a novel frontal-occipital second peak of visual N100 that was significantly increased in females relative to males. Further, in females exclusively, a corresponding central ERP component at around 220 ms was found; here, a strong correlation between stimulus salience and sex difference of the central ERP component amplitude was observed. Subsequent source analysis revealed increased cortical current densities in right rostral prefrontal (BA 10) and occipital cortex (BA 19) in female subjects. This is the first study to report on a tripartite association between sex differences in ERPs, visual stimulus salience, and right prefrontal cortex activation during attentional processing. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19172632      PMCID: PMC6870910          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  54 in total

Review 1.  Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control.

Authors:  Steven Yantis; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The relation of the trail making test to organic brain damage.

Authors:  R M REITAN
Journal:  J Consult Psychol       Date:  1955-10

Review 3.  Brain states: top-down influences in sensory processing.

Authors:  Charles D Gilbert; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Functional interactions between prefrontal and visual association cortex contribute to top-down modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Jesse Rissman; Jeffrey Cooney; Aaron Rutman; Tyler Seibert; Wesley Clapp; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Pattern reversal evoked potentials: gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency.

Authors:  R Emmerson-Hanover; D E Shearer; D J Creel; R E Dustman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1994-03

6.  P300, handedness, and corpus callosal size: gender, modality, and task.

Authors:  L D Hoffman; J Polich
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Auditory cortex and anterior cingulate cortex sources of the early evoked gamma-band response: relationship to task difficulty and mental effort.

Authors:  Christoph Mulert; Gregor Leicht; Oliver Pogarell; Roland Mergl; Susanne Karch; Georg Juckel; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Ulrich Hegerl
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition.

Authors:  Jing Feng; Ian Spence; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2007-10

10.  Sex differences in temporo-limbic and frontal brain volumes of healthy adults.

Authors:  Ruben C Gur; Faith Gunning-Dixon; Warren B Bilker; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  5 in total

1.  Attentional network changes in subjective cognitive decline.

Authors:  Mahdieh Esmaeili; Vahid Nejati; Mohsen Shati; Reza Fadaei Vatan; Negin Chehrehnegar; Mahshid Foroughan
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.481

2.  Smoking improves divided attention in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Eike Ahlers; Eric Hahn; Thi Minh Tam Ta; Elnaz Goudarzi; Michael Dettling; Andres H Neuhaus
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Sex differences in early sensorimotor processing for speech discrimination.

Authors:  David Thornton; Ashley W Harkrider; David E Jenson; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Sex related biases for attending to object color versus object position are reflected in reaction time and accuracy.

Authors:  Robert F McGivern; Matthew Mosso; Adam Freudenberg; Robert J Handa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Young Women do it Better: Sexual Dimorphism in Temporal Discrimination.

Authors:  Laura Jane Williams; John S Butler; Anna Molloy; Eavan McGovern; Ines Beiser; Okka Kimmich; Brendan Quinlivan; Sean O'Riordan; Michael Hutchinson; Richard B Reilly
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.