Literature DB >> 9180617

Complications, comorbidities, and mortality: improving classification and prediction.

L L Roos1, L Stranc, R C James, J Li.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: First, to compare the distribution of complications and comorbidities associated with 17 common surgical procedures. We then describe the effect of augmenting an ICD-9-CM version of the Charlson comorbidity index, given the possible confounding of comorbidities and complications, for three common inpatient surgical procedures: coronary artery bypass surgery, pacemaker surgery, and hip fracture repair. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY
SETTING: Individuals having one of the above procedures between April 1, 1990 and March 31, 1994, identified from Manitoba Health hospital discharge data, and their extracted records. STUDY
DESIGN: Design was cross-sectional and longitudinal using Manitoba data on hospital utilization and mortality. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION: Manitoba hospital discharge abstracts permit identifying whether or not the diagnosis represents an in-hospital complication of care. Two data sets were created for each procedure, one including complication diagnoses and another with complications removed. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The degree to which complications contaminated estimation of comorbidity depended both on the procedures studied and on the covariates selected. The unique structure of the algorithm for the Charlson comorbidity index led to complication diagnoses having only a minor effect on the comorbidity score generated. Unless a data set affords the opportunity to remove complication diagnoses, the improvement in comorbidity detection afforded by augmenting the Charlson index, combined with the potential for overestimation of comorbidity, seem sufficiently modest to contraindicate such augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180617      PMCID: PMC1070183     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  10 in total

1.  Acquired conditions: an improvement to hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  J M Naessens; M D Brennan; C J Boberg; P C Amadio; P J Karver; R O Podratz
Journal:  Qual Assur Health Care       Date:  1991

2.  Searching for an improved clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data.

Authors:  W A Ghali; R E Hall; A K Rosen; A S Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Postsurgical mortality in Manitoba and New England.

Authors:  L L Roos; E S Fisher; S M Sharp; J P Newhouse; G Anderson; T A Bubolz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-05-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives.

Authors:  P S Romano; L L Roos; J G Jollis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Impact of a nurses' strike on the cesarean birth rate.

Authors:  C A Mustard; C R Harman; P F Hall; S Derksen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Modeling the severity of illness of ICU patients. A systems update.

Authors:  S Lemeshow; J R Le Gall
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-10-05       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Comorbidities, complications, and coding bias. Does the number of diagnosis codes matter in predicting in-hospital mortality?

Authors:  L I Iezzoni; S M Foley; J Daley; J Hughes; E S Fisher; T Heeren
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Discordance of databases designed for claims payment versus clinical information systems. Implications for outcomes research.

Authors:  J G Jollis; M Ancukiewicz; E R DeLong; D B Pryor; L H Muhlbaier; D B Mark
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

  10 in total
  20 in total

1.  Risk adjustment using administrative data: impact of a diagnosis-type indicator.

Authors:  W A Ghali; H Quan; R Brant
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Detecting adverse events using information technology.

Authors:  David W Bates; R Scott Evans; Harvey Murff; Peter D Stetson; Lisa Pizziferri; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The evolving science of quality measurement for hospitals: implications for studies of competition and consolidation.

Authors:  Patrick S Romano; Ryan Mutter
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2004-06

5.  Does date stamping ICD-9-CM codes increase the value of clinical information in administrative data?

Authors:  Laurent G Glance; Andrew W Dick; Turner M Osler; Dana B Mukamel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Coding for quality measurement: the relationship between hospital structural characteristics and coding accuracy from the perspective of quality measurement.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2007-04-16

7.  Capturing diagnosis-timing in ICD-coded hospital data: recommendations from the WHO ICD-11 topic advisory group on quality and safety.

Authors:  V Sundararajan; P S Romano; H Quan; B Burnand; S E Drösler; S Brien; H A Pincus; W A Ghali
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.038

8.  Hospital volume can serve as a surrogate for surgeon volume for achieving excellent outcomes in colorectal resection.

Authors:  J W Harmon; D G Tang; T A Gordon; H M Bowman; M A Choti; H S Kaufman; J S Bender; M D Duncan; T H Magnuson; K D Lillemoe; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The importance of surgeon experience for clinical and economic outcomes from thyroidectomy.

Authors:  J A Sosa; H M Bowman; J M Tielsch; N R Powe; T A Gordon; R Udelsman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Data enhancement for co-morbidity measurement among patients referred for sleep diagnostic testing: an observational study.

Authors:  Paul E Ronksley; Willis H Tsai; Hude Quan; Peter Faris; Brenda R Hemmelgarn
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.