Literature DB >> 12595401

Detecting adverse events using information technology.

David W Bates1, R Scott Evans, Harvey Murff, Peter D Stetson, Lisa Pizziferri, George Hripcsak.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although patient safety is a major problem, most health care organizations rely on spontaneous reporting, which detects only a small minority of adverse events. As a result, problems with safety have remained hidden. Chart review can detect adverse events in research settings, but it is too expensive for routine use. Information technology techniques can detect some adverse events in a timely and cost-effective way, in some cases early enough to prevent patient harm.
OBJECTIVE: To review methodologies of detecting adverse events using information technology, reports of studies that used these techniques to detect adverse events, and study results for specific types of adverse events.
DESIGN: Structured review.
METHODOLOGY: English-language studies that reported using information technology to detect adverse events were identified using standard techniques. Only studies that contained original data were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adverse events, with specific focus on nosocomial infections, adverse drug events, and injurious falls.
RESULTS: Tools such as event monitoring and natural language processing can inexpensively detect certain types of adverse events in clinical databases. These approaches already work well for some types of adverse events, including adverse drug events and nosocomial infections, and are in routine use in a few hospitals. In addition, it appears likely that these techniques will be adaptable in ways that allow detection of a broad array of adverse events, especially as more medical information becomes computerized.
CONCLUSION: Computerized detection of adverse events will soon be practical on a widespread basis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12595401      PMCID: PMC150365          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.m1074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  69 in total

1.  Natural language processing and its future in medicine.

Authors:  C Friedman; G Hripcsak
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Ad hoc classification of radiology reports.

Authors:  D B Aronow; F Fangfang; W B Croft
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Medical language processing applied to extract clinical information from Dutch medical documents.

Authors:  P Spyns; N T Nhàn; E Baert; N Sager; G De Moor
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  1998

4.  Distinction between planned and unplanned readmissions following discharge from a Department of Internal Medicine.

Authors:  M P Kossovsky; F P Sarasin; F Bolla; J M Gaspoz; F Borst
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  Comparative study of prospective surveillance and voluntary reporting in determining the incidence of adverse drug reactions.

Authors:  B S Bennett; A G Lipman
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1977-09

6.  Computer surveillance of hospital-acquired infections and antibiotic use.

Authors:  R S Evans; R A Larsen; J P Burke; R M Gardner; F A Meier; J A Jacobson; M T Conti; J T Jacobson; R K Hulse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986 Aug 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Adverse drug event reporting. Improving the low US reporting rates.

Authors:  S A Edlavitch
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-07

8.  Using computers to identify complications after surgery.

Authors:  L L Roos; S M Cageorge; E Austen; K N Lohr
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Term domain distribution analysis: a data mining tool for text databases.

Authors:  J A Goldman; W W Chu; D S Parker; R M Goldman
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.176

10.  Hospital falls: a persistent problem.

Authors:  V R Morgan; J H Mathison; J C Rice; D I Clemmer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  125 in total

1.  Policy and the future of adverse event detection using information technology.

Authors:  David W Bates; R Scott Evans; Harvey Murff; Peter D Stetson; Lisa Pizziferri; George Hripcsak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Lack of awareness of community-acquired adverse drug reactions upon hospital admission : dimensions and consequences of a dilemma.

Authors:  Harald Dormann; Manfred Criegee-Rieck; Antje Neubert; Tobias Egger; Arnim Geise; Sabine Krebs; Thomas Schneider; Micha Levy; Eckhart Hahn; Kay Brune
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Detecting adverse drug events in discharge summaries using variations on the simple Bayes model.

Authors:  Shyam Visweswaran; Paul Hanbury; Melissa Saul; Gregory F Cooper
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

4.  Validation of automated event triggers using laboratory values related to two problem-prone drugs.

Authors:  Thomas C Bailey; Laura A Noirot; Erin M Christensen; Paul E Milligan; Nancy L Kimmel; Victoria J Fraser; Wm Claiborne Dunagan
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

5.  Leveraging of open EMR architecture for clinical trial accrual.

Authors:  Lawrence B Afrin; James C Oates; Caroline K Boyd; Mark S Daniels
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

6.  Automated extraction and normalization of findings from cancer-related free-text radiology reports.

Authors:  Burke W Mamlin; Daniel T Heinze; Clement J McDonald
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Using electronic health records to help coordinate care.

Authors:  Lynda C Burton; Gerard F Anderson; Irvin W Kues
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Study of the cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical record systems in general hospital in China.

Authors:  Kai Li; Shinji Naganawa; Kai Wang; Ping Li; Ken Kato; Xiu Li; Jie Zhang; Kazunobu Yamauchi
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  Improvement in the detection of adverse drug events by the use of electronic health and prescription records: an evaluation of two trigger tools.

Authors:  Ugochi Nwulu; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Rachel Odesanya; Sarah E McDowell; Jamie J Coleman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-06-17       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Identifying modifiable barriers to medication error reporting in the nursing home setting.

Authors:  Steven M Handler; Subashan Perera; Ellen F Olshansky; Stephanie A Studenski; David A Nace; Douglas B Fridsma; Joseph T Hanlon
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 4.669

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.