Literature DB >> 9179219

Value of 18fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the staging of recurrent breast carcinoma.

H Bender1, J Kirst, H Palmedo, A Schomburg, U Wagner, J Ruhlmann, H J Biersack.   

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of staging recurrent breast carcinoma employing fluorine-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) under routine clinical conditions. In 75 patients with suspected recurrent or metastatic disease, whole-body FDG-PET was performed and results correlated with morphological imaging (CT/MRI) data and verified by histological findings. FDG-PET correctly identified 16 patients with local recurrence, 28 with lymph node involvement, 15 with bone, 5 with lung and 2 with liver metastases. CT/MRI identified 10 patients with local recurrences, 17 with lymph node involvement, 6 with bone, 5 with lung and 1 with liver metastases. FDG-PET detected 6 local recurrences, 8 lymph node, and 7 bone metastases, which were not visualized by CT/MRI. Our data provide the basis for use of FDG-PET in the whole-body restaging of recurrent breast carcinoma in preselected patients under routine clinical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9179219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  18 in total

Review 1.  PET/CT and breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Zangheri; Cristina Messa; Maria Picchio; Luigi Gianolli; Claudio Landoni; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Tumour markers and FDG PET/CT for prediction of disease relapse in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Zora Baretta; Lorenzo Vinante; Anna Rita Cervino; Michele Gregianin; Cristina Ghiotto; Giorgio Saladini; Guido Sotti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Takako Nakai; Chio Okuyama; Takao Kubota; Kei Yamada; Yo Ushijima; Keiko Taniike; Takako Suzuki; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for detection of recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  T S Kim; W K Moon; D S Lee; J K Chung; M C Lee; Y K Youn; S K Oh; K J Choe; D Y Noh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Peter Lind; Isabel Igerc; Thomas Beyer; Peter Reinprecht; Klaus Hausegger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Sven C A Michel; Mathias K Fehr; Achim H Kaim; Hans C Steinert; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Comparison of whole-body STIR-MRI and 99mTc-methylene-diphosphonate scintigraphy in children with suspected multifocal bone lesions.

Authors:  Hans-J Mentzel; K Kentouche; D Sauner; C Fleischmann; S Vogt; D Gottschild; F Zintl; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  The role of positron emission tomographic imaging in breast cancer.

Authors:  Michelle D McDonough; Elizabeth R DePeri; Betty A Mincey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer: computed tomography versus positron emission tomography.

Authors:  D H Park; K H Kim; S Y Park; B H Lee; C W Choi; S Y Chin
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2000 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 10.  A systematic review of FDG-PET in breast cancer.

Authors:  S Escalona; J A Blasco; M M Reza; E Andradas; N Gómez
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.