Literature DB >> 15133636

PET/CT and breast cancer.

Barbara Zangheri1, Cristina Messa, Maria Picchio, Luigi Gianolli, Claudio Landoni, Ferruccio Fazio.   

Abstract

During the past decade, the application of positron emission tomography with [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG-PET) has remarkably improved the management of cancer patients. Nevertheless, the clinical interpretation of FDG-PET scan can be difficult for two main reasons: (1) anatomical localisation of FDG uptake is not easy, (2) normal physiological accumulation of FDG can be misinterpreted as a pathologic area. It has been demonstrated that the visual correlation of PET with morphological procedures, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, can improve the accuracy of PET alone. However, the time interval between the two scans, the time employed by the operator and difficulties in co-registering imaging of the abdomen and pelvis make the co-registration of separately obtained images clinically difficult. A novel combined PET/CT system has been built that improves the capacity to correctly localise and interpret FDG uptake. To date only a few studies have been conducted on the potential role of PET/CT in the management of breast cancer patients, but the better performance of this technique compared with PET alone should also be relevant for breast cancer application. In this review, we evaluate the possible impact on breast cancer diagnosis of PET/CT compared with PET alone, with respect to disease re-staging, treatment monitoring, preoperative staging and primary diagnosis. In addition, the possible role of PET/CT for radiotherapy planning is evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15133636     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1536-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  62 in total

1.  FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging.

Authors:  Emilio Bombardieri; Cumali Aktolun; Richard P Baum; Angelika Bishof-Delaloye; John Buscombe; Jean François Chatal; Lorenzo Maffioli; Roy Moncayo; Luc Mortelmans; Sven N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Combined PET/CT Imaging in Oncology. Impact on Patient Management.

Authors:  P G. Kluetz; C C. Meltzer; V L. Villemagne; P E. Kinahan; S Chander; M A. Martinelli; D W. Townsend
Journal:  Clin Positron Imaging       Date:  2000-11

3.  Detection method, tumour size and node metastases in breast cancers diagnosed during a trial of breast cancer screening.

Authors:  L Tabar; S W Duffy; U B Krusemo
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1987-07

4.  CT and (18)F-deoxyglucose (FDG) image fusion for optimization of conformal radiotherapy of lung cancers.

Authors:  P Giraud; D Grahek; F Montravers; M F Carette; E Deniaud-Alexandre; F Julia; J C Rosenwald; J M Cosset; J N Talbot; M Housset; E Touboul
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  FDG-PET scan in potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: do anatometabolic PET-CT fusion images improve the localisation of regional lymph node metastases? The Leuven Lung Cancer Group.

Authors:  J F Vansteenkiste; S G Stroobants; P J Dupont; P R De Leyn; W F De Wever; E K Verbeken; J L Nuyts; F P Maes; J G Bogaert
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1998-11

6.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Didier Lardinois; Walter Weder; Thomas F Hany; Ehab M Kamel; Stephan Korom; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Hans C Steinert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Can positron emission tomography (PET) be used to detect subclinical response to cancer therapy? The EC PET Oncology Concerted Action and the EORTC PET Study Group.

Authors:  P Price; T Jones
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography.

Authors:  R E Bird; T W Wallace; B C Yankaskas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  S W Fletcher; W Black; R Harris; B K Rimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Nuclear medicine advances in breast cancer imaging.

Authors:  E Bombardieri; F Crippa; S M Baio; B A Peeters; M Greco; E K Pauwels
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct
View more
  15 in total

1.  Tumour markers and FDG PET/CT for prediction of disease relapse in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Zora Baretta; Lorenzo Vinante; Anna Rita Cervino; Michele Gregianin; Cristina Ghiotto; Giorgio Saladini; Guido Sotti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Current and future use of positron emission tomography (PET) in breast cancer.

Authors:  David A Mankoff; William B Eubank
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 4.  Breast image registration techniques: a survey.

Authors:  Yujun Guo; Radhika Sivaramakrishna; Cheng-Chang Lu; Jasjit S Suri; Swamy Laxminarayan
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Chimeric ferritin nanocages for multiple function loading and multimodal imaging.

Authors:  Xin Lin; Jin Xie; Gang Niu; Fan Zhang; Haokao Gao; Min Yang; Qimeng Quan; Maria A Aronova; Guofeng Zhang; Seulki Lee; Richard Leapman; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 11.189

Review 6.  Role and cost effectiveness of PET/CT in management of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Wasif Saif; Ifigenia Tzannou; Nektaria Makrilia; Kostas Syrigos
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2010-06

7.  Unexpected foci of 18F-FDG uptake in the breast detected by PET/CT: incidence and clinical significance.

Authors:  Diana Litmanovich; Konstantin Gourevich; Ora Israel; Zahava Gallimidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Defining the role of PET-CT in staging early breast cancer.

Authors:  Ashley M Groves; Manu Shastry; Simona Ben-Haim; Irfan Kayani; Anmol Malhotra; Timothy Davidson; Tina Kelleher; Diane Whittaker; Marie Meagher; Brian Holloway; Ruth M Warren; Peter J Ell; Mohammed R Keshtgar
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-26

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence for Response Evaluation With PET/CT.

Authors:  Lise Wei; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.446

10.  False Positive 18F-FDG Uptake in Mediastinal Lymph Nodes Detected with Positron Emission Tomography in Breast Cancer: A Case Report.

Authors:  Gamze Uğurluer; Mustafa Kibar; Sinan Yavuz; Akin Kuzucu; Meltem Serin
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2013-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.