Literature DB >> 9179180

Selection and use of content experts for instrument development.

J S Grant1, L L Davis.   

Abstract

Content experts frequently are used in the judgment-quantification stage of content validation of instruments. However, errors in instrumentation may arise when important steps in selecting and using these experts are not carefully planned. The systematic process of choosing, orienting, and using content experts in the judgment-qualification stage of instrument development is addressed, with particular attention to the often neglected, important step of familiarizing these experts with the conceptual underpinnings and measurement model of the instrument. An example using experts to validate content for a measure of caregiver burden is used to illustrate this stage of instrument review.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9179180     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<269::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  140 in total

1.  The development and testing of an instrument for perceived self-efficacy for fatigue self-management.

Authors:  Amy J Hoffman; Alexander von Eye; Audrey G Gift; Barbara A Given; Charles W Given; Marilyn Rothert
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

2.  Japanese Translation and Cultural Adaptation of the Listening to Mothers II Questionnaire.

Authors:  Rieko Kishi; Beverly McElmurry; Susan Vonderheid; Susan Altfeld; Barbara McFarlin; Junko Tashiro
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2011

3.  Development of an instrument to measure students' perceptions of information technology fluency skills: establishing content validity.

Authors:  Marcia Sharp
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-09-01

4.  Brazilian-Portuguese Linguistic Validation of the Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcome Instrument.

Authors:  Rafael Denadai; Cassio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral; Anelise Sabbag; Rafael Andrade Ribeiro; Celso Luiz Buzzo; Cesar Augusto Raposo-Amaral; Man Hung; Jonathan R Skirko
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Theoretical to Tangible: Creating a Measure of Self-Advocacy for Female Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Teresa L Hagan; Susan Cohen; Clement Stone; Heidi Donovan
Journal:  J Nurs Meas       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation across several populations.

Authors:  Lili Garrard; Larry R Price; Marjorie J Bott; Byron J Gajewski
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-06-14

7.  Development and initial validation of an endoscopic part-task training box.

Authors:  Christopher C Thompson; Pichamol Jirapinyo; Nitin Kumar; Amy Ou; Andrew Camacho; Balazs Lengyel; Michele B Ryan
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 10.093

8.  Content validation of terms and definitions in a wound glossary.

Authors:  Catherine T Milne; Tim Paine; Valerie Sullivan; Allen Sawyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2012-07-22

9.  Research lessons from implementing a national nursing workforce study.

Authors:  T Brzostek; P Brzyski; M Kózka; A Squires; L Przewoźniak; M Cisek; K Gajda; T Gabryś; M Ogarek
Journal:  Int Nurs Rev       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.871

10.  Consensus recommendations of pediatric transfusion medicine objectives for clinical pathology residency training programs.

Authors:  Rosa Sanchez; Steven R Sloan; Cassandra D Josephson; Daniel R Ambruso; Christopher D Hillyer; Patricia O'Sullivan
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.