T Brzostek1, P Brzyski2, M Kózka1, A Squires3, L Przewoźniak4, M Cisek1, K Gajda5, T Gabryś1, M Ogarek1. 1. Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Nursing and Midwifery, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 2. Department of Medical Sociology, Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 3. International Education, College of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, USA. 4. Institute of Public Health, Health Promotion Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland. 5. Institute of Public Health, Medical Information System Department, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: National nursing workforce studies are important for evidence-based policymaking to improve nursing human resources globally. Survey instrument translation and contextual adaptation along with level of experience of the research team are key factors that will influence study implementation and results in countries new to health workforce studies. AIM: This study's aim was to describe the pre-data collection instrument adaptation challenges when designing the first national nursing workforce study in Poland while participating in the Nurse Forecasting: Human Resources Planning in Nursing project. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the pre-data collection phase of the study. Instrument adaptation was conducted through a two-phase content validity indexing process and pilot testing from 2009 to September 2010 in preparation for primary study implementation in December 2010. Means of both content validation phases were compared with pilot study results to assess for significant patterns in the data. RESULTS: The initial review demonstrated that the instrument had poor level of cross-cultural relevance and multiple translation issues. After revising the translation and re-evaluating using the same process, instrument scores improved significantly. Pilot study results showed floor and ceiling effects on relevance score correlations in each phase of the study. LIMITATIONS: The cross-cultural adaptation process was developed specifically for this study and is, therefore, new. It may require additional replication to further enhance the method. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used by the Polish team helped identify potential problems early in the study. The critical step improved the rigour of the results and improved comparability for between countries analyses, conserving both money and resources. This approach is advised for cross-cultural adaptation of instruments to be used in national nursing workforce studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Countries seeking to conduct national nursing workforce surveys to improve nursing human resources policies may find the insights provided by this paper useful to guide national level nursing workforce study implementation.
BACKGROUND: National nursing workforce studies are important for evidence-based policymaking to improve nursing human resources globally. Survey instrument translation and contextual adaptation along with level of experience of the research team are key factors that will influence study implementation and results in countries new to health workforce studies. AIM: This study's aim was to describe the pre-data collection instrument adaptation challenges when designing the first national nursing workforce study in Poland while participating in the Nurse Forecasting: Human Resources Planning in Nursing project. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the pre-data collection phase of the study. Instrument adaptation was conducted through a two-phase content validity indexing process and pilot testing from 2009 to September 2010 in preparation for primary study implementation in December 2010. Means of both content validation phases were compared with pilot study results to assess for significant patterns in the data. RESULTS: The initial review demonstrated that the instrument had poor level of cross-cultural relevance and multiple translation issues. After revising the translation and re-evaluating using the same process, instrument scores improved significantly. Pilot study results showed floor and ceiling effects on relevance score correlations in each phase of the study. LIMITATIONS: The cross-cultural adaptation process was developed specifically for this study and is, therefore, new. It may require additional replication to further enhance the method. CONCLUSIONS: The approach used by the Polish team helped identify potential problems early in the study. The critical step improved the rigour of the results and improved comparability for between countries analyses, conserving both money and resources. This approach is advised for cross-cultural adaptation of instruments to be used in national nursing workforce studies. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING AND HEALTH POLICY: Countries seeking to conduct national nursing workforce surveys to improve nursing human resources policies may find the insights provided by this paper useful to guide national level nursing workforce study implementation.
Keywords:
Content Validity Indexing; Cross-Cultural Instrument Validation; Health Workforce; Human Resources for Health; Nurses; Nursing; Poland; Survey Research
Authors: Allison Squires; Linda H Aiken; Koen van den Heede; Walter Sermeus; Luk Bruyneel; Rikard Lindqvist; Lisette Schoonhoven; Ingeborg Stromseng; Reinhard Busse; Tomasz Brzostek; Anneli Ensio; Mayte Moreno-Casbas; Anne Marie Rafferty; Maria Schubert; Dimitris Zikos; Anne Matthews Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Dietmar Ausserhofer; Britta Zander; Reinhard Busse; Maria Schubert; Sabina De Geest; Anne Marie Rafferty; Jane Ball; Anne Scott; Juha Kinnunen; Maud Heinen; Ingeborg Strømseng Sjetne; Teresa Moreno-Casbas; Maria Kózka; Rikard Lindqvist; Marianna Diomidous; Luk Bruyneel; Walter Sermeus; Linda H Aiken; René Schwendimann Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2013-11-10 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Linda H Aiken; Douglas M Sloane; Luk Bruyneel; Koen Van den Heede; Walter Sermeus Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2012-12-17 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Walter Sermeus; Linda H Aiken; Koen Van den Heede; Anne Marie Rafferty; Peter Griffiths; Maria Teresa Moreno-Casbas; Reinhard Busse; Rikard Lindqvist; Anne P Scott; Luk Bruyneel; Tomasz Brzostek; Juha Kinnunen; Maria Schubert; Lisette Schoonhoven; Dimitrios Zikos Journal: BMC Nurs Date: 2011-04-18