Literature DB >> 917733

Effect of distance information and range on two indices of visually perceived distance.

J M Foley.   

Abstract

Subjects made verbal reports of the perceived distance of near visual targets and indicated their distances by pointing at them with an unseen hand. The targets were presented under three stimulus conditions: monocular, binocular, and multicue. Two ranges of target distance were studied in separate experiments: 11-39 cm and 21-33 cm. When reciprocals of both response distance and target distance were plotted, all functions were approximately linear. The verbal and manual responses (distance indices) differed greatly, but were found to be related by a constant transform. The range of target distances had no effect on either index. The standard deviation of the manual response was about half that of the verbal response. Stimulus condition had a large effect, with the multicue condition producing the greatest change in indicated distance. and the monocular condition the least. The results are discussed with reference to the definition of perceived distance, and hypothesis concerning the integration of distance information.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 917733     DOI: 10.1068/p060449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  20 in total

1.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Lili Tcheang; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Focus cues affect perceived depth.

Authors:  Simon J Watt; Kurt Akeley; Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceiving geographical slant.

Authors:  D R Proffitt; M Bhalla; R Gossweiler; J Midgett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1995-12

6.  Expectation affects verbal judgments but not reaches to visually perceived egocentric distances.

Authors:  Christopher C Pagano; Robert W Isenhower
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

7.  Catching ease influences perceived speed: evidence for action-specific effects from action-based measures.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Mila Sugovic
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  Adaptation of egocentric distance perception under telestereoscopic viewing within reaching space.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Rafael Laboissière; Olivier Sillan; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine top-down effects on perception.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

10.  Visual alleys as a function of instructions under informative and reduced conditions of viewing.

Authors:  A Higashiyama; T Ishikawa; K Tanaka
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.