Literature DB >> 9168000

Endogenous estrogens and breast cancer risk: the case for prospective cohort studies.

P G Toniolo1.   

Abstract

It is generally agreed that estrogens, and possibly androgens, are important in the etiology of breast cancer, but no consensus exists as to the precise estrogenic or androgenic environment that characterizes risk, or the exogenous factors that influence the hormonal milieu. Nearly all the epidemiological studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s were hospital-based case-control studies in which specimen sampling was performed well after the clinical appearance of the disease. Early prospective cohort studies also had limitations in their small sample sizes or short follow-up periods. However, more recent case-control studies nested within large cohorts, such as the New York University Women's Health Study and the Ormoni e Dieta nell'Eziologia dei Tumori study in Italy, are generating new data indicating that increased levels of estrone, estradiol and bioavailable estradiol, as well as their androgenic precursors, may be associated with a 4- to 6-fold increase in the risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Further new evidence, which complements and expands the observations from the latter studies, shows that women with the thickest bone density, which may be a surrogate for cumulated exposure to hormones, experience severalfold increased risk of subsequent breast cancer as compared to women with thin bones. These data suggests that endogenous sex hormones are a key factor in the etiology of postmenopausal breast cancer. New prospective cohort studies should be conducted to examine the role of endogenous sex hormones in blood and urine samples obtained early in the natural history of breast cancer jointly with an assessment of bone density and of other important risk factors, such as mammographic density, physical activity, body weight, and markers of individual susceptibility, which may confer increased risk through an effect on the metabolism of endogenous hormones or through specific metabolic responses to Western lifestyle and diet.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9168000      PMCID: PMC1469902          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.97105s3587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  64 in total

1.  Sex hormones and postmenopausal breast cancer: a prospective study in an adult community.

Authors:  C F Garland; N J Friedlander; E Barrett-Connor; K T Khaw
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Androgens in postmenopausal breast cancer: excretion, production and interaction with estrogens.

Authors:  J H Thijssen; J Poortman; F Schwarz
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.292

Review 3.  The free hormone hypothesis: a physiologically based mathematical model.

Authors:  C M Mendel
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 19.871

Review 4.  Reproductive factors and breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Kelsey; M D Gammon; E M John
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Bioavailability of estradiol as a marker for breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  L A Jones; D M Ota; G A Jackson; P M Jackson; K Kemp; D E Anderson; S K McCamant; D H Bauman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  International differences in body height and weight and their relationship to cancer incidence.

Authors:  D Albanes; P R Taylor
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.900

7.  Serum concentrations of total and non-protein-bound oestradiol in patients with breast cancer and in normal controls.

Authors:  J W Moore; G M Clark; R D Bulbrook; J L Hayward; J T Murai; G L Hammond; P K Siiteri
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1982-01-15       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 8.  Human mammary cancer as a site of sex steroid metabolism.

Authors:  A Vermeulen
Journal:  Cancer Surv       Date:  1986

9.  Reduced risk of breast and endometrial cancer among women with hip fractures (Sweden).

Authors:  I Persson; H O Adami; J K McLaughlin; T Naessén; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  A prospective study of urinary oestrogen excretion and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  T J Key; D Y Wang; J B Brown; C Hermon; D S Allen; J W Moore; R D Bulbrook; I S Fentiman; M C Pike
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  11 in total

1.  Physical activity reduces breast cancer risk in African American women.

Authors:  Vanessa B Sheppard; Kepher Makambi; Teletia Taylor; Sherrie Flynt Wallington; Jennifer Sween; Lucile Adams-Campbell
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Alberta physical activity and breast cancer prevention trial: sex hormone changes in a year-long exercise intervention among postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Christine M Friedenreich; Christy G Woolcott; Anne McTiernan; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Rollin F Brant; Frank Z Stanczyk; Tim Terry; Norman F Boyd; Martin J Yaffe; Melinda L Irwin; Charlotte A Jones; Yutaka Yasui; Kristin L Campbell; Margaret L McNeely; Kristina H Karvinen; Qinggang Wang; Kerry S Courneya
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Breast cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; James R Hebert; Susan Bolick-Aldrich; Virginie G Daguise; Catishia M Mosley; Mary V Modayil; Sondra H Berger; Jane Teas; Michael Mitas; Joan E Cunningham; Susan E Steck; James Burch; William M Butler; Marie-Josephe D Horner; Heather M Brandt
Journal:  J S C Med Assoc       Date:  2006-08

4.  Exercise in cancer.

Authors:  P Rajarajeswaran; R Vishnupriya
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2009-04

5.  Pregnancy-related characteristics and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Theodore M Brasky; Yanli Li; David J Jaworowicz; Nancy Potischman; Christine B Ambrosone; Alan D Hutson; Jing Nie; Peter G Shields; Maurizio Trevisan; Carole B Rudra; Stephen B Edge; Jo L Freudenheim
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Rethinking breast cancer risk and the environment: the case for the precautionary principle.

Authors:  D L Davis; D Axelrod; L Bailey; M Gaynor; A J Sasco
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Understanding the human health effects of chemical mixtures.

Authors:  David O Carpenter; Kathleen Arcaro; David C Spink
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Organochlorine exposures influence on breast cancer risk and survival according to estrogen receptor status: a Danish cohort-nested case-control study.

Authors:  A P Høyer; T Jørgensen; F Rank; P Grandjean
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2001-07-30       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  High Bone Mineral Density of the Lumbar Spine Is Positively Associated with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Larissa Vaz Gonçalves; Karine Anusca Martins; Jordana Carolina Marques Godinho-Mota; Raquel Machado Schincaglia; Ana Luisa Lima Sousa; Ruffo Freitas-Junior
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Waist-hip ratio and breast cancer risk in urbanized Nigerian women.

Authors:  Clement A Adebamowo; Temidayo O Ogundiran; Adeniyi A Adenipekun; Rasheed A Oyesegun; Oladapo B Campbell; Effiong E Akang; Charles N Rotimi; Olunfunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.