Literature DB >> 17319236

Breast cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.

Swann Arp Adams1, James R Hebert, Susan Bolick-Aldrich, Virginie G Daguise, Catishia M Mosley, Mary V Modayil, Sondra H Berger, Jane Teas, Michael Mitas, Joan E Cunningham, Susan E Steck, James Burch, William M Butler, Marie-Josephe D Horner, Heather M Brandt.   

Abstract

A discrepancy exists between mortality and incidence rates between African-American and European-American women in South Carolina. The relationship between tumor grade and the estrogen/ progesterone receptor status is different in African-American and European-American women. African-American women with breast cancer should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials, with the goal of identifying biological factors that might facilitate the detection of tumors at an earlier stage and the development of more effective therapies. The most important of our goals is to design studies to reduce the incidence of the disease and interventions to improve survival and quality of life. The importance of participation in research cannot be overstated. Reproductive factors such as early pregnancy and multiple pregnancies are strongly related to breast cancer risk, however, promotion of these factors as a "prevention strategy," clearly does not lead to cogent, comprehensive public health messages. Data from ecological and migrant studies point clearly to other factors that may be important such as diet. Additional research around primary prevention strategies is needed. In addition, yearly mammograms (secondary prevention) are recommended for women over 50 years old or those with relatives who have developed breast cancer. The Best Chance Network, as a provider of screenings to low-income, uninsured women, has helped to narrow the racial gap in screening that otherwise might exist (see Figures 3 and 4) to a large extent. The determination for timing of surgery after diagnosis needs additional consideration. For example, factors such as effective screening in younger women, timing of screening and surgery in relationship to the ovulatory cycle, and season of screening and surgery may have a great impact on outcomes and may offer some insight into the process of carcinogenesis and therapeutic efficacy. Research into this area is so novel that the impact on possible ethnic disparities is completely unknown. The South Carolina Cancer Disparities Community Network (SCCDCN) has identified the following areas as potential research foci: Identification of small media interventions as an effective strategy to motivate targeted populations, especially those least likely to seek screening for breast cancer and those least likely to participate in research programs (African-Americans). Utilization of breast cancer survivors, self-identified as community natural helpers, can share their experiences with their church congregation. A replication of such a program in South Carolina has great potential because of the strong presence of the church, especially in rural parts of the state. Programs that closely integrate religion with screening women for breast cancer are promising in this state. Development of a mammography registry whereby information on all mammography procedures would be collected within a single database system (much like a central cancer registry). This would aid in identifying population groups that could be targeted for special programs and in the examination and exploration of the most appropriate modalities of detection. Such a resource could also be a useful tool to encourage screening. Thus, this focus area has the potential to benefit epidemiologic and health promotion research on many different levels. Additional breast cancer screening methods should not be overlooked as a potential research focus. Mammography is not the only valid screening method for breast cancer. Magnetic resonance imaging has shown some promise for screening among women with a genetic predisposition for cancer. Another promising avenue is thermography. Because detection rates may depend on age, ethnicity, and breast mammographic characteristics, women for whom regular screening methods do not detect their cancers (e.g. older age, African-American ethnicity, dense breasts) must be identified and other screening methods promoted within these populations. The above-mentioned mammography registry would support this type of research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17319236      PMCID: PMC2965587     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J S C Med Assoc        ISSN: 0038-3139


  91 in total

1.  Dietary fat and postmenopausal breast cancer.

Authors:  L H Kushi; T A Sellers; J D Potter; C L Nelson; R G Munger; S A Kaye; A R Folsom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-07-15       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Avoidable causes of breast cancer: the known, unknown, and the suspected.

Authors:  D L Davis; D Axelrod; M Osborne; N Telang; H L Bradlow; E Sittner
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1997-12-29       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Local recurrence following breast conservation therapy in African-American women with invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  C S Connor; A K Touijer; L Krishnan; M S Mayo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Dietary fat, carbohydrate balance, and weight maintenance: effects of exercise.

Authors:  J P Flatt
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Adipose tissue as a source of hormones.

Authors:  P K Siiteri
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Dietary fat and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  W C Willett; M J Stampfer; G A Colditz; B A Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-01-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Breast cancer-race, ethnicity, and survival: a literature review.

Authors:  Jennifer B Campbell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Relation of breast cancer with passive and active exposure to tobacco smoke.

Authors:  A Morabia; M Bernstein; S Héritier; N Khatchatrian
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 9.  Is mammography screening for breast cancer really not justifiable?

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2003

10.  A prospective study of urinary oestrogen excretion and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  T J Key; D Y Wang; J B Brown; C Hermon; D S Allen; J W Moore; R D Bulbrook; I S Fentiman; M C Pike
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  15 in total

1.  Reducing cancer disparities through innovative partnerships: a collaboration of the South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network and Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Vicki M Young; Darcy A Freedman; Swann Arp Adams; Heather M Brandt; Sudha Xirasagar; Tisha M Felder; John R Ureda; Thomas Hurley; Leepao Khang; Dayna Campbell; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in a multiethnic cohort in the Southeast.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; William M Butler; Jeanette Fulton; Sue P Heiney; Edith M Williams; Alexandria F Delage; Leepao Khang; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A comparison of breast and cervical cancer legislation and screening in Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.

Authors:  Stephanie Miles-Richardson; Daniel Blumenthal; Ernest Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

4.  Mind the gap: racial differences in breast cancer incidence and biologic phenotype, but not stage, among low-income women participating in a government-funded screening program.

Authors:  Joan E Cunningham; Christine A Walters; Elizabeth G Hill; Marvella E Ford; Tiffany Barker-Elamin; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  The impact of a randomized dietary and physical activity intervention on chronic inflammation among obese African-American women.

Authors:  Oluwole Adeyemi Babatunde; Swann Arp Adams; Samantha Truman; Erica Sercy; Angela E Murphy; Samira Khan; Thomas G Hurley; Michael D Wirth; Seul Ki Choi; Hiluv Johnson; James R Hebert
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2020-04-05

6.  Mapping cancer mortality-to-incidence ratios to illustrate racial and sex disparities in a high-risk population.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Virginie G Daguise; Deborah M Hurley; Rebecca C Wilkerson; Catishia M Mosley; Swann A Adams; Robin Puett; James B Burch; Susan E Steck; Susan W Bolick-Aldrich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A prospective study of cardiorespiratory fitness and breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  J Brent Peel; Xuemei Sui; Swann A Adams; James R Hébert; James W Hardin; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Disparities in Breast Cancer Incidence, Mortality, and Quality of Care among African American and European American Women in South Carolina.

Authors:  Marsha E Samson; Nancy G Porter; Deborah M Hurley; Swann A Adams; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 0.954

9.  Racial differences in follow-up of abnormal mammography findings among economically disadvantaged women.

Authors:  Swann A Adams; Emily R Smith; James Hardin; Irene Prabhu-Das; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Breast cancer survival among economically disadvantaged women: the influences of delayed diagnosis and treatment on mortality.

Authors:  Emily Rose Smith; Swann Arp Adams; Irene Prabhu Das; Matteo Bottai; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.