| Literature DB >> 20596305 |
P Rajarajeswaran1, R Vishnupriya.
Abstract
Physical exercise has attracted increased interest in rehabilitation of oncological patients. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature and summarize the evidence of physical exercise in preventing cancer, its ability in attenuating the effect of cancer and its treatments and to provide guidelines for exercise prescription Review of recent literature by electronic search of MEDline (Pub Med), Cancer lit, Cochrane libraries, CINAHL were done using Keywords and the variables were identified and systematically evaluated. There is strong evidence for reduced risk of colorectal and breast cancer with possible association for prostate, endometrial and lung cancer with increasing physical activity. Exercise helps cancer survivors cope with and recover from treatment; exercise may improve the health of long term cancer survivors and extend survival. Physical exercise will benefit throughout the spectrum of cancer. However, an understanding of the amount, type and intensity of exercise needed has not been fully elucidated. There is sufficient evidence to promote exercise in cancer survivors following careful assessment and tailoring on exercise prescription.Entities:
Keywords: Exercise; cancer; prevention; rehabilitation
Year: 2009 PMID: 20596305 PMCID: PMC2885882 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.60050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol ISSN: 0971-5851
Epidemiologic evidence on association between physical activity and cancer and possible biological mechanisms
| Cancer site | Average risk reduction % | Overall level of scientific evidence | Possible mechnisms involved | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colon[ | 40-50 | Convincing | Decreased gastrointestinal transit time | physical activity increases gut motility and reduces mucosal exposure time to carcinogens. |
| Decreased ratio of prostaglandins | Strenuous exercise may increase prostaglandin (PG) F, which inhibits colonic cell proliferation and increases gut motility while not increasing PGE2, which affects colonic cell proliferation, opposite to the effect of PGF. | |||
| Lowered bile acid secretion or enhanced acid metabolism | Bile acid concentrations may be decreased in physically active (Confounding by diet) persons. | |||
| Breast[ | 30-40 | Convincing | Decreased lifetime exposure to estrogen | Physical activity delays menarche, reduces the number of ovulatory cycles, and reduces ovarian estrogen production. It also reduces body fat and could reduce fat-produced estrogens. It increases the production of sex hormon-binding globulin, resulting in less biologically available estrogen. |
| Prostate[ | 10-30 | Probable | Reduced exposure to testosterone | Physical activity increases production of sex hormone-binding globulin, resulting in lower levels of free testosterone |
| Endometrium[ | 30-40 | Possible | Decreased percent | Fat storage of carcinogens can occur in visceral fat, |
| Ovary[ | 20-30 | Insufficient | body fat | which can be released in overweight individuals. |
| Lung[ | 30-40 | Possible | NE | NE |
| Testis[ | 10-30 | Insufficient | NE | NE |
| All cancers[ | NE | NE | Genetic predisposition of habitually active people | Constitutional factors influence athletic selection or interest in physical activity and susceptibility to cancer. |
| Exercise-induced increase in antitumor immune defenses | Exercise may increase number and activity of macrophages, lymphokine-activated killer cells and their regulating cytokines; it may increase mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation. | |||
| Improved antioxidant defense systems | Strenuous exercise increases the production of free radicals, whereas chronic exercise improves free radical defenses by up-regulating both the activities of free scavenger enzymes and antioxidant levels. | |||
| Decreased circulating insulin and glucose Decreased insulin and insulin-like growth factors | Increased exercise may decrease levels of insulin and bioavailable IGF-I, both of which enhance division of normal cells and inhibit cell death. |
Definitions adapted from the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research (1). Convincing evidence is defined as evidence that is conclusive; probable evidence indicates evidence is strong enough to conclude that a causal relation is likely; possible evidence indicates a causal relation may exist; insufficient evidence indicates evidence is suggestive but too sparse to make a more definitive judgment. NE not examined, IGF: Insulin-like growth factors
Systematic reviews of physical activity in cancer survivors, published 2004-2008
| Study | Studies reviewed | Authors' conclusions |
|---|---|---|
| Kirshbaum, 2007[ | Systematic review of 29 intervention and observational studies in breast cancer survivors | Affirmation of the central proposition that exercise seems to be beneficial and safe for a variety of breast cancer patients continues. |
| Markes | Systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 controlled trials in breast cancer survivors during adjuvant therapy | Improvement can be expected in physical fitness and the resulting capacity for performing activities of daily life. An improvement for other outcomes is still tenable. |
| McNeely | Systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 randomized trials in breast cancer survivors | Exercise is an effective intervention to improve quality of life, cardio respiratory fitness, physical functioning, and fatigue. |
| Conn | Systematic review and meta-analysis of 30 intervention studies in cancer survivors | Exercise interventions resulted in small positive effects on health and wellbeing outcomes. |
| Schmitz | Systematic review and meta-analysis of 32 controlled trials in cancer survivors | Physical activity improves cardio respiratory fitness during and after cancer treatment, symptoms and physiologic effects during treatment, and vigor post-treatment. |
| Knols | Systematic review of 34 controlled trials in cancer survivors | Cancer patients may benefit from physical exercise both during and after treatment. |
| Douglas, 2005[ | Systematic review of 21 intervention studies in cancer survivors | There is a growing body of evidence to justify the inclusion of exercise programs in the rehabilitation of cancer patients returning to health after treatment. |
| Galvao and Newton, 2005[ | Systematic review of 26 intervention studies in cancer survivors | Preliminary positive physiologic and psychological benefits from exercise when undertaken during or after traditional cancer treatment. |
| Stevinson | Systematic review and meta-analysis of 33 controlled trials in cancer survivors | Exercise interventions for cancer patients can lead to moderate increases in physical function and are not associated with increased symptoms of fatigue. |
| Oldervoll | Systematic review of 12 randomized controlled trials in cancer survivors | Cancer patients benefit from maintaining physical activity balanced with efficient rest periods |
Figure 1Framework PEACE: an organizational model for examining when and how physical exercise may affect the cancer experience. [Adapted from Courneya K.S, Friedenreich C.M.2]
FITT exercise prescription for apparently healthy individuals
| FITT principal components | Frequency | Intensity | Time | Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardio respiratory (Aerobic training) | 3 to 5 days per week | 40% or 50-85% HRR 40% or 50-85% Vo2R 55% or 65-90% HRmax | 20 to 60 minutes | Dynamic use of large muscle groups |
| Muscular strength and endurance (Resistance training) | 2 to 3 days per week | 12-16 RPE | 1 set of 3 to 20 repetitions (e.g. 3 to 5, 8 to 10, 12 to 15) | 8 to 10 exercises (All major muscles) |
| Flexibility | 2 to 7 days per week | Stretch to tightness at the end of the range of motion but not to pain | 15 to 30 seconds 2 to 4 times/ stretch | Static stretches (All major muscles) |
FITT = frequency, intensity, time, type; HRR = heart rate reserve; HR max = maximum heart rate; RPE = rate of perceived exertion; VO2R = maximum oxygen consumption reserve. Data adapted from ACSM.