Literature DB >> 9166565

Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic.

D S Katz1, M J Lane, F G Sommer.   

Abstract

Renal colic, defined as acute flank pain caused by the passage of a ureteral calculus, is a common condition, but the correct diagnosis may not be apparent clinically. For decades, intravenous urography has been the test of choice for evaluating patients with suspected renal colic. Recently, unenhanced (non-contrast) helical CT has been shown to be an accurate and highly effective examination which can be used instead of intravenous urography. In this article, the technique is reviewed in detail, including its advantages and potential pitfalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9166565     DOI: 10.1007/BF02742925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi.

Authors:  B J Hillman; G W Drach; P Tracey; J A Gaines
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi.

Authors:  J H Newhouse; E L Prien; E S Amis; S P Dretler; R C Pfister
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Ureteral calculi.

Authors:  J R Thornbury; T W Parker
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 0.800

4.  Renal colic: diagnosis and outcome.

Authors:  M C Haddad; H S Sharif; M S Shahed; M A Mutaiery; A M Samihan; B M Sammak; L A Southcombe; A D Crawford
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Sonography vs. excretory urography in acute flank pain.

Authors:  M C Hill; J I Rich; J G Mardiat; C A Finder
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Detection of ureteral calculi in patients with suspected renal colic: value of reformatted noncontrast helical CT.

Authors:  F G Sommer; R B Jeffrey; G D Rubin; S Napel; S A Rimmer; J Benford; P M Harter
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  R C Smith; M Verga; S McCarthy; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.

Authors:  D S Katz; M J Lane; F G Sommer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Ultrasound versus excretory urography in evaluating acute flank pain.

Authors:  F C Laing; R B Jeffrey; V W Wing
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Chip-Jin Ng; Jih-Chang Chen; Te-Fa Chiu; Yon-Cheong Wong
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

3.  Investigating the clinical significance of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm.

Authors:  Mehmet Korkmaz; Bekir Aras; Bekir Sanal; Mehmet Yücel; Serkan Güneyli; Ahmet Koçak; Fatih Uruç
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Sheng-Hsien Chu; Chih-Shou Chen; Lai-Chu See; Yang-Jen Chiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.

Authors:  Takehiko Nakasato; Jun Morita; Yoshio Ogawa
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Emergency department imaging protocol for suspected acute renal colic: re-evaluating our service.

Authors:  K Patatas; N Panditaratne; T M Wah; M J Weston; H C Irving
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Limited added utility of performing follow-up contrast-enhanced CT in patients undergoing initial non-enhanced CT for evaluation of flank pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  Monica D Agarwal; Robin B Levenson; Bettina Siewert; Marc A Camacho; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 8.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients.

Authors:  Tomás Ripollés; Marcos Agramunt; José Errando; María Jesús Martínez; Belén Coronel; María Morales
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Analyzing the effect of distance from skin to stone by computed tomography scan on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rate of renal stones.

Authors:  Byung-Hun Park; Hoon Choi; Jin-Bum Kim; Young-Seop Chang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-01-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.