Literature DB >> 15060838

Diagnosis of acute flank pain caused by ureteral stones: value of combined direct and indirect signs on IVU and unenhanced helical CT.

Li-Jen Wang1, Chip-Jin Ng, Jih-Chang Chen, Te-Fa Chiu, Yon-Cheong Wong.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of combined direct and indirect signs on intravenous urography (IVU) and unenhanced helical computed tomography (UHCT) for the diagnosis of ureteral stones in emergency patients with acute flank pain. During an 8-month period, 82 emergency patients with acute flank pain undergoing IVU and UHCT with sufficient clinical follow-up formed the study group. The presence or absence of direct sign (visualization of ureteral stones) and indirect signs on IVU and UHCT was recorded. The diagnostic accuracy of each direct/indirect sign and their combination for the diagnosis of ureteral stones on IVU and UHCT were analyzed and compared. Of the 82 patients, 66 had ureteral stones, four had passed urinary stones prior to imaging and 12 had other diseases. The diagnostic accuracies of direct signs on IVU and UHCT for the diagnosis of ureteral stones were 79.3 and 98.8%, respectively, which was more accurate than that of any single indirect sign on IVU and UHCT. However, the diagnostic accuracy of ureteral stones by IVU increased to 90.2% when using diagnostic criteria requiring the presence of a direct sign or at least three indirect signs, and by UHCT, it increased to 100% when using diagnostic criteria requiring the presence of a direct sign with at least one indirect sign. Therefore, for emergency patients with acute flank pain, the use of the above combinations of direct/indirect signs is useful as the diagnostic criterion for ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15060838     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2309-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  18 in total

1.  Evaluation of image quality and dose in renal colic: comparison of different spiral-CT protocols.

Authors:  A Rimondini; R Pozzi Mucelli; M De Denaro; P Bregant; L Dalla Palma
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comments on Dalla Palma et al.: Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic.

Authors:  M Torkzad
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic.

Authors:  D S Katz; M J Lane; F G Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Relationship between duration of pain and secondary signs of obstruction of the urinary tract on unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  M J Varanelli; D M Coll; J A Levine; A T Rosenfield; R C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  S Yilmaz; T Sindel; G Arslan; C Ozkaynak; K Karaali; A Kabaalioğlu; E Lüleci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  One year's clinical experience with unenhanced spiral computed tomography for the assessment of acute loin pain suggestive of renal colic.

Authors:  T J Greenwell; S Woodhams; E R Denton; A MacKenzie; S C Rankin; R Popert
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  Acute ureteral obstruction: value of secondary signs of helical unenhanced CT.

Authors:  R C Smith; M Verga; N Dalrymple; S McCarthy; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  S A Pfister; A Deckart; S Laschke; S Dellas; U Otto; C Buitrago; J Roth; W Wiesner; G Bongartz; T C Gasser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Unenhanced helical CT of ureteral stones: incidence of associated urinary tract findings.

Authors:  D S Katz; M J Lane; F G Sommer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

1.  Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi: thin-slice CT findings.

Authors:  Mehmet Arac; Halil Celik; A Yusuf Oner; Serap Gultekin; Terman Gumus; Sule Kosar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 3.  Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: Many roads lead to Rome.

Authors:  Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Nigel Cowan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Investigations for recognizing urinary stone.

Authors:  Gayathri Varma; Nandu Nair; Abiya Salim; Y M Fazil Marickar
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-10-14

Review 5.  [Imaging modalities and therapy options in patients with acute flank pain].

Authors:  A Grosse; C Grosse
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Multi-detector row CT urography on a 16-row CT scanner in the evaluation of urothelial tumors.

Authors:  A C Tsili; S C Efremidis; J Kalef-Ezra; D Giannakis; Y Alamanos; N Sofikitis; C Tsampoulas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Li-Jen Wang; Yon-Cheong Wong; Cheng-Keng Chuang; Sheng-Hsien Chu; Chih-Shou Chen; Lai-Chu See; Yang-Jen Chiang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of Hounsfield Units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition.

Authors:  Takehiko Nakasato; Jun Morita; Yoshio Ogawa
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  Secondary signs on preoperative CT as predictive factors for febrile urinary tract infection after ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Jin Woo Kim; You Jin Lee; Yun-Sok Ha; Jun Nyung Lee; Hyun Tae Kim; So Young Chun; Bum Soo Kim
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.