Literature DB >> 25082439

Limited added utility of performing follow-up contrast-enhanced CT in patients undergoing initial non-enhanced CT for evaluation of flank pain in the emergency department.

Monica D Agarwal1, Robin B Levenson, Bettina Siewert, Marc A Camacho, Vassilios Raptopoulos.   

Abstract

In our emergency department (ED), patients with flank pain often undergo non-enhanced computed tomography (NECT) to assess for nephroureteral (NU) stone. After immediate image review, decision is made regarding need for subsequent contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to help assess for other causes of pain. This study aimed to review the experience of a single institution with this protocol and to assess the utility of CECT. Over a 6 month period, we performed a retrospective analysis on ED patients presenting with flank pain undergoing CT for a clinical diagnosis of nephroureterolithiasis. Patients initially underwent abdominopelvic NECT. The interpreting radiologist immediately decided whether to obtain a CECT to evaluate for another etiology of pain. Medical records, CT reports and images, and 7-day ED return were reviewed. CT diagnoses on NECT and CECT were compared. Additional information from CECT and changes in management as documented in the patient's medical record were noted. Three hundred twenty-two patients underwent NECT for obstructing NU stones during the study period. Renal or ureteral calculi were detected in 143/322 (44.4 %). One hundred fifty-four patients (47.8 %) underwent CECT. CECT added information in 17/322 cases (5.3 %) but only changed management in 6/322 patients (1.9 %). In four of these patients with final diagnosis of renal infarct, splenic infarct, pyelonephritis and early acute appendicitis in a thin patient, there was no abnormality on the NECT (4/322 patients, 1.2 %). In the remaining 2 patients, an abnormality was visible on the NECT. In patients presenting with flank pain with a clinical suspicion of nephroureterolithiasis, CECT may not be indicated. While CECT provided better delineation of an abnormality in 5.3 % of cases, changes in management after CECT occurred only in 2 %. This included 1 % of patients in whom a diagnosis of organ infarct, pyelonephritis or acute appendicitis in a thin patient could only be made on CECT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25082439     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-014-1259-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  19 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Bong Soo Kim; Im Kyung Hwang; Yo Won Choi; Sook Namkung; Heung Cheol Kim; Woo Cheol Hwang; Kuk Myung Choi; Ji Kang Park; Tae Il Han; Weechang Kang
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Non-contrast spiral CT for patients with suspected renal colic.

Authors:  D S Katz; M J Lane; F G Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Alexandra Platon; Olivier T Rutschmann; Franz R Schmidlin; Christophe E Iselin; Christoph D Becker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors.

Authors:  Antonio C Westphalen; Renee Y Hsia; Judith H Maselli; Ralph Wang; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.

Authors:  N C Dalrymple; M Verga; K R Anderson; P Bove; A M Covey; A T Rosenfield; R C Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations.

Authors:  D S Katz; M Scheer; J H Lumerman; B C Mellinger; C A Stillman; M J Lane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.

Authors:  R C Smith; A T Rosenfield; K A Choe; K R Essenmacher; M Verga; M G Glickman; R C Lange
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  State of the art trends in imaging renal of colic.

Authors:  Sravanthi Reddy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-04-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Systematic unenhanced CT for acute abdominal symptoms in the elderly patients improves both emergency department diagnosis and prompt clinical management.

Authors:  Ingrid Millet; Mustapha Sebbane; Nicolas Molinari; Emma Pages-Bouic; Fernanda Curros-Doyon; Bruno Riou; Patrice Taourel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnosing acute appendicitis using a nonoral contrast CT protocol in patients with a BMI of less than 25.

Authors:  Vijay Ramalingam; David D B Bates; Karen Buch; Jennifer Uyeda; Kathy M Zhao; Lindsey A Storer; Marisa B Roberts; Christina A Lebedis; Jorge A Soto; Stephan W Anderson
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-07-08

3.  Effect of intravenous contrast for CT abdomen and pelvis on detection of urgent and non-urgent pathology: can repeat CT within 72 hours be avoided?

Authors:  Christine Lamoureux; Scott Weber; Tarek Hanna; Andrew J Grabiel; Reese H Clark
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22

4.  Emergency department non-contrast computed tomography for suspicion of obstructive urolithiasis: Yield and consequences.

Authors:  Ziv Savin; Snir Dekalo; Eran Schreter; Reuben Ben-David; Ismail Masarwa; Adva Cahen-Peretz; Sharon A Greenberg; Galit Aviram; Ofer Yossepowitch; Mario Sofer
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.052

5.  Acute nontraumatic splenic infarctions at a tertiary-care center: causes and predisposing factors in 123 patients.

Authors:  Mougnyan Cox; Zhenteng Li; Vishal Desai; Lauren Brown; Sandeep Deshmukh; Christopher G Roth; Laurence Needleman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-01-21

6.  Portal phase alone is equivalent to multiphasic phase for CT diagnosis of acute non-traumatic pains in an emergency context.

Authors:  Guillaume Herpe; Samy Boucebci; Tiphaine Cassan; Marine Verdier; Charles Simonet; Guillaume Sztark; Jean Pierre Tasu
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-11-28

Review 7.  [When are contrast agents really needed? : Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  G Layer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.635

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.