Literature DB >> 9163825

Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.

T Price1.   

Abstract

The use of the independent contrast method in comparative tests is studied. It is assumed that: (i) the traits under investigation are subject to natural selection; (ii) closely related species are similar because they share many characteristics of their niche, inherited from a common ancestor; and (iii) the current adaptive significance of the traits is the focus of investigation. The main objection to the use of species values in this case is that third variables which are shared by closely related species confound the relationship between the focal traits. In this paper, I argue that third variables are largely not controlled by the contrast methods, which are designed to estimate correlated evolution. To the extent that third variables also show correlated evolution, the true relationship among the traits of interest will remain obscured. Although the independent contrast method does not resolve the influence of third traits it does, in principle, provide a greater resolution than the use of the species mean values. However, its validity depends on the applicability of an evolutionary model which has a substantial stochastic component. To illustrate the consequences of relaxing this assumption I consider an alternative model of an adaptive radiation, where species come to fill a fixed niche space. Under this model, the expected value for the contrast correlation differs from that for the species correlation. The two correlations differ because contrasts reflect the historical pattern of diversification among species, whereas the species values describe the present-day relationships among the species. If the latter is of interest, I suggest that assessing significance based on the species correlations can be justified, providing that attention is paid to the role of potentially confounding third traits. Often, differences between contrast and species correlations may be biologically informative, reflecting changes in correlations between traits as an adaptive radiation proceeds; contrasts may be particularly useful as a means of investigating past history, rather than current utility of traits.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9163825      PMCID: PMC1691942          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  10 in total

1.  Sperm size and sperm competition in birds.

Authors:  J V Briskie; R Montgomerie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1992-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Comparative methods for explaining adaptations.

Authors:  P H Harvey; A Purvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolution of ecological differences in the Old World leaf warblers.

Authors:  A D Richman; T Price
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The phylogenetic regression.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1989-12-21       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals.

Authors:  M D Pagel; P H Harvey
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-06-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Direct DNA sequencing of the rat neu oncogene transmembrane domain reveals no mutation in urinary bladder carcinomas induced by N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine, N-[4-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-2-thiazolyl]formamide or N-methyl-N-nitrosourea.

Authors:  T Masui; A M Mann; T L Macatee; E M Garland; T Okamura; R A Smith; S M Cohen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Seeking the evolutionary regression coefficient: an analysis of what comparative methods measure.

Authors:  M Pagel
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1993-09-21       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds.

Authors:  T J Devoogd; J R Krebs; S D Healy; A Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1993-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The adaptive significance of reproductive strategies in ungulates.

Authors:  B E Saether; I J Gordon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1994-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21
  10 in total
  43 in total

1.  Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations.

Authors:  P H Harvey; A Rambaut
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2000-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn.

Authors:  Robert J Thomas; Tamás Székely; Innes C Cuthill; David G C Harper; Stuart E Newson; Tim D Frayling; Paul D Wallis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A comparative study of white blood cell counts and disease risk in carnivores.

Authors:  Charles L Nunn; John L Gittleman; Janis Antonovics
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Why breed every other year? The case of albatrosses.

Authors:  Pierre Jouventin; F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Age at the onset of senescence in birds and mammals is predicted by early-life performance.

Authors:  Guillaume Péron; Olivier Gimenez; Anne Charmantier; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Pierre-André Crochet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Antioxidant enzyme activities are not broadly correlated with longevity in 14 vertebrate endotherm species.

Authors:  Melissa M Page; Jean Richardson; Brent E Wiens; Esther Tiedtke; Craig W Peters; Paul A Faure; Gary Burness; Jeffrey A Stuart
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2010-01-27

7.  Simulating trait evolution for cross-cultural comparison.

Authors:  Charles L Nunn; Christian Arnold; Luke Matthews; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A conserved pattern of brain scaling from sharks to primates.

Authors:  Kara E Yopak; Thomas J Lisney; Richard B Darlington; Shaun P Collin; John C Montgomery; Barbara L Finlay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  How slow breeding can be selected in seabirds: testing Lack's hypothesis.

Authors:  F Stephen Dobson; Pierre Jouventin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Correlated evolution of maternally derived yolk testosterone and early developmental traits in passerine birds.

Authors:  K B Gorman; T D Williams
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.