Literature DB >> 2740904

Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body weight among mammals.

M D Pagel1, P H Harvey.   

Abstract

Theories for the evolution of brain weight in mammals suggest that closely related species have diverged largely as a result of selection for differences in body weight, but that differences among more distantly related species have arisen due to greater net directional selection on brain weight. This pattern of changing selection causes brain weight to evolve more slowly than body weight among closely related species, such as those in the same genus, than among more distantly related species, such as those from different families or orders; a phenomenon known as the "taxon-level effect." Thus, brain weight differs more for a given difference in body weight as the species compared are more distantly related. An alternative explanation for the taxon-level effect is proposed. Distantly related species are more likely to inhabit different ecological conditions than are more closely related species. Where the taxon-level effect occurs, brain weight appears to have evolved in response to the demands of these different ecological conditions. As a consequence, brain weight differs more among distantly related species, for any given difference in body weight, than among closely related species. This effect, rather than a progressive pattern of changing selection pressures, may account for the taxon-level effect in mammals.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2740904     DOI: 10.1126/science.2740904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  15 in total

1.  How quickly do brains catch up with bodies? A comparative method for detecting evolutionary lag.

Authors:  R O Deaner; C L Nunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Brain size is correlated with endangerment status in mammals.

Authors:  Eric S Abelson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Distinct evolutionary patterns of morphometric sperm traits in passerine birds.

Authors:  Simone Immler; Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer; Tim R Birkhead
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.

Authors:  T Price
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Quantitative genetic analysis of brain size variation in sticklebacks: support for the mosaic model of brain evolution.

Authors:  Kristina Noreikiene; Gábor Herczeg; Abigél Gonda; Gergely Balázs; Arild Husby; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Female brain size and parental care in carnivores.

Authors:  J L Gittleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  An allometric interpretation of the spatio-temporal organization of molecular and cellular processes.

Authors:  M A Aon; S Cortassa
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1993-03-10       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Evolution of spatial cognition: sex-specific patterns of spatial behavior predict hippocampal size.

Authors:  L F Jacobs; S J Gaulin; D F Sherry; G E Hoffman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Hypercarnivory and the brain: protein requirements of cats reconsidered.

Authors:  Regina Eisert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.200

10.  Nasonia Parasitic Wasps Escape from Haller's Rule by Diphasic, Partially Isometric Brain-Body Size Scaling and Selective Neuropil Adaptations.

Authors:  Jitte Groothuis; Hans M Smid
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 1.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.