Literature DB >> 17148257

How slow breeding can be selected in seabirds: testing Lack's hypothesis.

F Stephen Dobson1, Pierre Jouventin.   

Abstract

The historical debate of the 1960s between group and individual selection hinged on how the slow breeding of seabirds could be explained. While this debate was settled by the ascendance of individual selection, championed by David Lack, explanations for slow breeding in seabirds remain to be tested. We examined the slowest breeding of these birds, the albatrosses and petrels (order Procellariiformes), using analyses that statistically controlled for variations in body size and phylogeny. Incubation and fledging periods appeared strongly correlated, but this turned out to be largely explained by phylogeny. Nonetheless, developmental and reproductive rates were associated with the distance to the foraging range, as predicted under the hypothesis of ecological constraints on breeding pairs, and these results were independent of body size and phylogeny. Slower breeding in these seabirds appeared associated with the rigors of farther pelagic feeding, as Lack originally hypothesized.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17148257      PMCID: PMC1685855          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  4 in total

1.  Using the Past to Predict the Present: Confidence Intervals for Regression Equations in Phylogenetic Comparative Methods.

Authors:  Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Why breed every other year? The case of albatrosses.

Authors:  Pierre Jouventin; F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Correlated evolution and independent contrasts.

Authors:  T Price
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Age-related mate choice in the wandering albatross.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.844

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Lifestyles and phylogeny explain bird life histories.

Authors:  F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A lifestyle view of life-history evolution.

Authors:  F Stephen Dobson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energetics, lifestyle, and reproduction in birds.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Christopher C Witt; Natalie A Wright; Chris Venditti; Walter Jetz; James H Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolution of embryonic developmental period in the marine bird families Alcidae and Spheniscidae: roles for nutrition and predation?

Authors:  J Mark Hipfner; Kristen B Gorman; Rutger A Vos; Jeffrey B Joy
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Serial monogamy and sex ratio bias in Nazca boobies.

Authors:  Terri J Maness; David J Anderson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Effects of age and reproductive status on individual foraging site fidelity in a long-lived marine predator.

Authors:  Stephen C Votier; Annette L Fayet; Stuart Bearhop; Thomas W Bodey; Bethany L Clark; James Grecian; Tim Guilford; Keith C Hamer; Jana W E Jeglinski; Greg Morgan; Ewan Wakefield; Samantha C Patrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  The influence of phylogeny and life history on telomere lengths and telomere rate of change among bird species: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  François Criscuolo; F Stephen Dobson; Quentin Schull
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.167

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.