Literature DB >> 9160365

A comparison of gaseous emboli release in five membrane oxygenators.

P D Beckley1, P D Shinko, J P Sites.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the air handling capability of five currently used membrane oxygenators: the Avecor Affinity, the Bentley SpiralGold, the Medtronic Maxima Plus, the Sarns Turbo and the Sorin Monolyth M. A circuit was constructed to include a hardshell venous reservoir and roller pump. Pressure monitoring sites and ultrasonic microbubble detection probes were located proximal and distal to the oxygenator. An air injection/infusion site was provided proximal to the roller pump inlet. Each circuit was primed with fresh anticoagulated bovine blood, adjusted to a haematocrit of 25% and maintained at 38 +/- 1 degree C. Three different bolus amounts of air (10, 20 and 40 cm3) were injected at three blood flow rates (3, 4.5 and 6 l/min). A 1-min infusion of air delivered at 1 ml/s was also administered at three blood flow rates (3, 4.5 and 6 l/min). The hardshell reservoir was also completely emptied at each flow rate to simulate a massive air infusion. At any given blood flow, outlet microbubble counts were usually higher with greater bolus amounts of air. When indexed to the inlet bubble counts, the following average percent microbubbles were released from the outlet: Turbo 25%, Affinity 7%, Monolyth 5%, Maxima 3% and SpiralGold 1%. With a constant air infusion of 1 ml/s, greater outlet microbubble counts were associated with higher blood flow rates. Again, when indexed to the inlet bubble counts, the following average percent microbubbles were released from the outlet: Turbo 44%, Affinity 25%, Maxima 19%, Monolyth 16% and SpiralGold 0%. All oxygenators deprimed when the hardshell reservoir was emptied and all shed microbubbles into the outlet blood except the SpiralGold. The results of this study indicate that air handling is not a simple function of blood flow pattern (i.e. top to bottom versus bottom to top), but also includes dynamics associated with oxygenator design, fibre arrangement and flow resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9160365     DOI: 10.1177/026765919701200208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perfusion        ISSN: 0267-6591            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Evidence-based used, yet still controversial: the arterial filter.

Authors:  Filip De Somer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

2.  Gaseous microemboli and the influence of microporous membrane oxygenators.

Authors:  Heinz-H Weitkemper; Bernd Oppermann; Andreas Spilker; Hermann-J Knobl; Reiner Körfer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2005-09

3.  Gaseous microemboli in a pediatric bypass circuit with an unprimed venous line: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Andrea Hudacko; Alicia Sievert; Joseph Sistino
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-09

4.  Gaseous microemboli: do we finally start to comprehend how to remove them?

Authors:  Filip De Somer
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Post-arterial filter gaseous microemboli activity of five integral cardiotomy reservoirs during venting: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gerard J Myers; Cheri Voorhees; Rob Haynes; Bob Eke
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-03

6.  Vacuum-assisted venous drainage, angel or demon: PRO?

Authors:  Yves Durandy
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-06

7.  Pulsatile flow decreases gaseous micro-bubble filtering properties of oxygenators without integrated arterial filters during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Aldo D Milano; Mikhail Dodonov; Francesco Onorati; Tiziano Menon; Leonardo Gottin; Giovanni Malerba; Alessandro Mazzucco; Giuseppe Faggian
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.