Literature DB >> 9159035

Atrial fibrillation in patients with permanent VVI pacemakers: risk factors for atrial fibrillation.

J G Cho1, Y H Jeong, I J Cho, Y G Ahn, K S Cha, J P Seo, J H Park, M H Jeong, J C Park, J C Kang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) does not only deteriorate the cardiac function and increases the thromboembolic risk but also triggers rapid and irregular ventricular rhythm in patients with atrial synchronous pacing. However, the risk factors for the development of AF in patients with pacemakers are not clearly determined yet. The present study was designed to determine the risk factors for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers.
METHODS: This study included 80 patients (41 sick sinus syndrome, 39 AV block) who were followed for more than 6 months or developed AF regardless of the duration of follow-up after implantation of VVI pacemakers. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not AF developed during follow-up (mean: 25.7 +/- 2.5 months): group A developed AF and group B did not. The underlying arrhythmias, cardiovascular risk factors, left atrial size, characteristics of P wave were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 58.9 +/- 11.4 years and 28 (35%) were male. AF developed in 13 (16.3%) of 80 patients with VVI pacemakers. Sick sinus syndrome (SSS) as an underlying arrhythmia was significantly more frequent in group A than group B (84.6% vs. 44.8%, p < 0.01). P wave width was greater in group A (127.6 +/- 24.8 ms) than in group B (110.7 +/- 17 ms) (p < 0.05). There was, however, no significant difference in cardiovascular risk factors, left atrial size, P wave axis and amplitude between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that sinus node dysfunction and intra-atrial conduction delay may be the risk factors for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers. Further studies are needed to determine how sick sinus syndrome and intra-atrial conduction delay increase the risk for AF in patients with VVI pacemakers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159035      PMCID: PMC4531969          DOI: 10.3904/kjim.1997.12.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Intern Med        ISSN: 1226-3303            Impact factor:   2.884


  14 in total

Review 1.  Ventricular pacing for sick sinus syndrome--a risky business?

Authors:  A J Camm; D Katritsis
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Evolution of P wave characteristics after pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  J Snoeck; H Decoster; M Verherstraeten; M Berkhof; A Vorlat; H Heuten; C Vrints; J C Kahn; X Marchand
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.

Authors:  A B Hesselson; V Parsonnet; A D Bernstein; G J Bonavita
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Influence of cardiac pacing mode on the long-term development of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J M Feuer; A H Shandling; J C Messenger
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Atrial versus ventricular pacing in sinus node disease: a treatment comparison study.

Authors:  M Rosenqvist; J Brandt; H Schüller
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Compendium of pacemaker technology. Introduction and historical review.

Authors:  W Irnich; V Parsonnet; G H Myers
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Morbidity and mortality of patients with sinus node disease: comparative effects of atrial and ventricular pacing.

Authors:  R Zanini; A I Facchinetti; G Gallo; L Cazzamalli; L Bonandi; L Dei Cas
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 8.  Does dual chamber or atrial pacing prevent atrial fibrillation? The need for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  G A Lamas; N M Estes; S Schneller; G C Flaker
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  A comparison of symptoms and intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure during long term dual chamber atrioventricular synchronous (DDD) and ventricular demand (VVI) pacing.

Authors:  N A Boon; A J Frew; J A Johnston; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1987-07

10.  The signal-averaged P wave duration: a rapid and noninvasive marker of risk of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S A Guidera; J S Steinberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.