Literature DB >> 3304370

A comparison of symptoms and intra-arterial ambulatory blood pressure during long term dual chamber atrioventricular synchronous (DDD) and ventricular demand (VVI) pacing.

N A Boon, A J Frew, J A Johnston, S M Cobbe.   

Abstract

Fifteen patients with dual chamber pacemakers implanted for atrioventricular block (11) or sinoatrial disease (4) completed a single blind within-patient comparison of symptoms and 24 hour intra-arterial blood pressure during long term atrioventricular synchronous (DDD) pacing and long term ventricular demand (VVI) pacing. The patients reported significantly less breathlessness, fatigue, and dizziness and a significantly greater sense of general well-being during DDD pacing than during VVI pacing. Twelve of the fifteen patients expressed a strong preference for DDD pacing. Systolic blood pressure tended to be lower and was significantly more variable during VVI pacing than during DDD pacing (mean (SD) daytime systolic blood pressure 132.4 (17.1) and 140.4 (13.1) mm Hg respectively). Accordingly, episodes of hypotension were more common during VVI pacing, which may partly explain why the patients reported more symptoms during this mode of pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3304370      PMCID: PMC1277244          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.58.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  11 in total

1.  Physiological versus single-rate ventricular pacing: a double-blind cross-over study.

Authors:  B E Kristensson; K Arnman; P Smedgård; L Rydén
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 1.976

2.  Ambulatory blood pressure and assessment of pacemaker function.

Authors:  R I Jones; P M Cashman; R S Hornung; H Prince; L Bassein; E B Raftery
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1986-05

3.  Continuous recording of direct arterial pressure and electrocardiogram in unrestricted man.

Authors:  W A Littler; A J Honour; P Sleight; F D Stott
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1972-07-08

4.  Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing.

Authors:  E J Perrins; C A Morley; S L Chan; R Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-08

5.  "Physiological" pacing.

Authors:  J S Geddes
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-08

6.  A comparison of the acute and long-term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.

Authors:  I Kruse; K Arnman; T B Conradson; L Rydén
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Three cases of hypotension and syncope with ventricular pacing: possible role of atrial reflexes.

Authors:  C Alicandri; F M Fouad; R C Tarazi; L Castle; V Morant
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Autoregulation of brain circulation in severe arterial hypertension.

Authors:  S Strandgaard; J Olesen; E Skinhoj; N A Lassen
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-03-03

9.  Carotid sinus syncope treated by pacing. Analysis of persistent symptoms and role of atrioventricular sequential pacing.

Authors:  C A Morley; E J Perrins; P Grant; S L Chan; D J McBrien; R Sutton
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1982-05

10.  Continuous ambulatory monitoring of blood pressure and assessment of cardiovascular reflexes in the elderly hypertensive.

Authors:  D B Rowlands; T J Stallard; W A Littler
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.844

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Is VVI pacing outmoded?

Authors:  A W Nathan; D W Davies
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-04

2.  Permanent pacemakers in nonagenarians.

Authors:  J E Elizabeth; G J Green
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  The United Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events (UKPACE) trial. United Kingdom Pacing and Cardiovascular Events.

Authors:  W D Toff; J D Skehan; D P De Bono; A J Camm
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Correcting a block? Successful experience of a small British pacing centre.

Authors:  S Joseph
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-02

5.  Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.

Authors:  K G Oldroyd; A P Rae; R Carter; C Wingate; S M Cobbe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-04

6.  Atrial fibrillation in patients with permanent VVI pacemakers: risk factors for atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  J G Cho; Y H Jeong; I J Cho; Y G Ahn; K S Cha; J P Seo; J H Park; M H Jeong; J C Park; J C Kang
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 7.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J Dretzke; W D Toff; G Y H Lip; J Raftery; A Fry-Smith; R Taylor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.