Literature DB >> 9153033

Contributions of the left and right cerebral hemispheres to line bisection.

M Mennemeier1, E Vezey, A Chatterjee, S Z Rapcsak, K M Heilman.   

Abstract

Thirty-one right-hemisphere lesioned (RHL) patients, 11 left-hemisphere lesioned patients (LHL) and 10 normal controls (NC) bisected lines in three spatial location and four directional cuing conditions. The error direction and error size were analyzed as separate and combined variables. Seventy-seven percent of RHL patients and 45% of LHL patients made abnormally large errors in line bisection. Right-hemisphere lesioned patients were more sensitive to spatial location and directional cuing than NC subjects. In contrast, LHL patients were less sensitive to either condition than NCs. The error direction and error size emerged as dissociable components of line bisection. Right-hemisphere lesioned patients and NC subjects bisected lines consistently to one side of the true center. Left-hemisphere lesioned patients bisected lines equally often on both sides of the true center. Both RHL and LHL patients made larger absolute bisection errors than NC subjects, but the RHL patient's errors were larger than those of the LHL patients. We propose that the greater sensitivity of RHL patients to spatial location and directional cues and the directional consistency of their bisection errors represent contributions of the intact left cerebral hemisphere to line bisection. In contrast, the LHL patient's unrestrained ability to orient to both ends of the line reflects a contribution of the intact right cerebral hemisphere to line bisection. The failure of both groups to accurately bisect lines reflects a common visuospatial processing deficit that is more pronounced following RHLs than LHLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9153033     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(96)00114-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Biases in attentional orientation and magnitude estimation explain crossover: neglect is a disorder of both.

Authors:  Mark Mennemeier; Christopher A Pierce; Anjan Chatterjee; Britt Anderson; George Jewell; Rachael Dowler; Adam J Woods; Tannahill Glenn; Victor W Mark
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The perceptual consequences of the attentional bias: evidence for distractor removal.

Authors:  Matthias Niemeier; Vaughan V W Singh; Matthew Keough; Nadine Akbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Static versus dynamic judgments of spatial extent.

Authors:  Marc Hurwitz; Derick Valadao; James Danckert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Hemifield asymmetry in the potency of exogenous auditory and visual cues.

Authors:  Yamaya Sosa; Aaron M Clarke; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Time-on-task effect in pseudoneglect.

Authors:  André Dufour; Pascale Touzalin; Victor Candas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Crossover by line length and spatial location.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; C Pierce; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  A search for the optimal stimulus.

Authors:  M Mennemeier; S Z Rapcsak; M Dillon; E Vezey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Neglect dyslexia: a review of the neuropsychological literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vallar; Cristina Burani; Lisa S Arduino
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Line bisection in Parkinson's disease: investigation of contributions of visual field, retinal vision, and scanning patterns to visuospatial function.

Authors:  Thomas M Laudate; Sandy Neargarder; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Brain activity during landmark and line bisection tasks.

Authors:  Metehan Ciçek; Leon Y Deouell; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.