Literature DB >> 9149816

The evolution of genomic imprinting: two modifier-locus models.

H G Spencer1, M J Williams.   

Abstract

We present two autosomal two-locus models in which the primary locus, A, may be imprinted according to the alleles present at the second, modifier locus, M. In the first model, the modifier is cis-acting, which assumes that imprinting occurs late in gametogenesis: whether or not A is imprinted depends only on the M allele in the (unfertilized) egg. We examine three cases in which polymorphism at A is maintained by a mutation-selection balance or heterozygote advantage. We show that a newly arising modifier allele without direct fitness effects can increase at a rate only of the order of the mutation rate at the A locus. This result mirrors that found in two-locus models of the evolution of dominance modifiers. Modifiers that also alter fitnesses, however, may spread quickly. In the second model, a monomorphic primary locus, A, is imprinted according to the mother's genotype at the second, diallelic modifier locus, M. The model is therefore trans-acting, which assumes imprinting occurs early in gametogenesis: whether or not A is imprinted depends on both of the mother's M genes. We show that a newly arising modifier will increase in frequency via selection if either imprinting is advantageous and the modifier increases the proportion of imprinted gametes or imprinting is disadvantageous and the proportion is decreased. Both of these factors-the selective effect of imprinting and the proportion of gametes imprinted-affect the rate of modifier evolution. Selectively maintained polymorphism at the modifier locus is unlikely unless the alleles interact in a nonadditive fashion.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9149816     DOI: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  14 in total

1.  Population models of genomic imprinting. I. Differential viability in the sexes and the analogy with genetic dominance.

Authors:  R J Anderson; H G Spencer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic conflicts in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  A Burt; R Trivers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Genomic imprinting in plants: observations and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  M Alleman; J Doctor
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Parental modifiers, antisense transcripts and loss of imprinting.

Authors:  Jon F Wilkins; David Haig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A chip off the old block: a model for the evolution of genomic imprinting via selection for parental similarity.

Authors:  Hamish G Spencer; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Sex-specific viability, sex linkage and dominance in genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Jeremy Van Cleve; Marcus W Feldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; A G Clark
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 8.  Coadaptation and conflict, misconception and muddle, in the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  D Haig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Genetic conflicts, multiple paternity and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  H G Spencer; M W Feldman; A G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Ploidy and the evolution of endosperm of flowering plants.

Authors:  Aurélie Cailleau; Pierre-Olivier Cheptou; Thomas Lenormand
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-11-23       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.