Literature DB >> 9149254

Frameless stereotactic guidance for surgery of the upper cervical spine.

W C Welch1, B R Subach, I F Pollack, G B Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to evaluate and describe the use of a frameless, computed tomography-guided, stereotactic technique in complex procedures involving the craniocervical junction.
METHODS: Eleven procedures, including transoral odontoid resection, posterior atlantoaxial fusion with transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation, and spinal tumor resection, were performed in the preceding 26 months. In each case, frameless stereotaxy was used to plan the incision, to define resection margins, and to determine the appropriate orientation of instrumentation.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications noted. Each patient underwent adequate resection of the pathological lesion and satisfactory placement of instrumentation. The stereotactic system provided detailed anatomic visualization, which increased the confidence of the surgeon during the procedure. The system limited the need for extensive surgical exposure, reduced fluoroscopy time, and decreased the risk of neurovascular injury.
CONCLUSION: Frameless stereotaxy provided the surgeon with intraoperative information regarding the extent of bone and soft tissue resection. It provided a multidimensional view of anatomic relationships in the operative field, which significantly increased surgical accuracy and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9149254     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199705000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

1.  Computer-assisted posterior instrumentation of the cervical and cervico-thoracic spine.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Thomas Mattes; Balkan Cakir
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Frameless stereotaxy in a transmandibular, circumglossal, retropharyngeal cervical decompression in a Klippel-Feil patient: technical note.

Authors:  Daniel M Sciubba; Ira M Garonzik; Ian Suk; Gary L Gallia; Anthony Tufaro; Jean Paul Wolinsky; Alex Taghva; Ziya L Gokaslan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Nikolaos K Paschos; Emilios E Pakos; Angelos N Politis; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Athanasios C Karageorgos; Avraam Ploumis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Image-guided transoral surgery in childhood.

Authors:  Jessica Ternier; Shabin M Joshi; Dominic N P Thompson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  The use of computer-assisted surgery as an educational tool for the training of orthopedic surgery residents in pedicle screw placement: a pilot study and survey among orthopedic residents.

Authors:  Ahmed Aoude; Hamzah Alhamzah; Maryse Fortin; Peter Jarzem; Jean Ouellet; Michael H Weber
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Computer-assisted C1-C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation "Magerl Technique" for Atlantoaxial Instability.

Authors:  Masashi Uehara; Jun Takahashi; Hiroki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Hashidate; Nobuhide Ogihara; Keijiro Mukaiyama; Hiroyuki Kato
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2012-08-21

7.  The development and evaluation of individualized templates to assist transoral C2 articular mass or transpedicular screw placement in TARP-IV procedures: adult cadaver specimen study.

Authors:  Xue-Shi Li; Zeng-Hui Wu; Hong Xia; Xiang-Yang Ma; Fu-Zhi Ai; Kai Zhang; Jian-Hua Wang; Xiao-Hong Mai; Qing-Shui Yin
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.365

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.