Literature DB >> 9147982

Improved agreement of foot segmental power and rate of energy change during gait: inclusion of distal power terms and use of three-dimensional models.

K L Siegel1, T M Kepple, G E Caldwell.   

Abstract

Traditional models used to calculate foot segmental power have yielded poor agreement between foot power and the rate of energy change during the stance phase of gait and limited the applicability of foot segmental power analyses to swing phase only. The purpose of this study was to improve the agreement of foot segmental power and rate of energy change by using more inclusive models to calculate foot segmental power and energy. The gait of 15 adult subjects was studied and models were used to calculate foot segmental power that included either the proximal terms only (Model P, the most common method in the literature) or both proximal and distal terms (Model PD, a mathematically complete model). Power and energy terms were computed in two ways, from sagittal plane vector components only (two-dimensional condition) and from complete three-dimensional components (three-dimensional condition). Results revealed that the more inclusive the model, the higher the agreement of foot power and rate of energy change. During stance phase, Model P produced poor agreement (r(c) = 0.108) for both two-dimensional and three-dimensional conditions, Model PD-2D yielded higher agreement (r(c) = 0.645), and Model PD-3D exhibited nearly perfect agreement (r(c) = 0.956). The advantages of a segmental power analysis include the ability to identify the mechanisms of energy transfer into and out of the foot during movement. The results of this study suggest that foot power analyses are valid when using Model PD-3D to describe foot function during locomotion.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9147982     DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(96)83336-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  9 in total

1.  Inter-joint coupling effects on muscle contributions to endpoint force and acceleration in a musculoskeletal model of the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  Keith W van Antwerp; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles during walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Valentina La Scaleia; Yuri P Ivanenko; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  A unified perspective on ankle push-off in human walking.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Peter G Adamczyk
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Soft Tissue Deformations Contribute to the Mechanics of Walking in Obese Adults.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Fu; Karl E Zelik; Wayne J Board; Raymond C Browning; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 5.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Foot and shoe responsible for majority of soft tissue work in early stance of walking.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Adding Stiffness to the Foot Modulates Soleus Force-Velocity Behaviour during Human Walking.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Michael T Gross; Herman van Werkhoven; Stephen J Piazza; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Energy neutral: the human foot and ankle subsections combine to produce near zero net mechanical work during walking.

Authors:  Kota Z Takahashi; Kate Worster; Dustin A Bruening
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Foot arch rigidity in walking: In vivo evidence for the contribution of metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion.

Authors:  Daniel J Davis; John H Challis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.