Literature DB >> 27903626

A unified perspective on ankle push-off in human walking.

Karl E Zelik1,2,3, Peter G Adamczyk4,5.   

Abstract

Muscle-tendon units about the ankle joint generate a burst of positive power during the step-to-step transition in human walking, termed ankle push-off, but there is no scientific consensus on its functional role. A central question embodied in the biomechanics literature is: does ankle push-off primarily contribute to leg swing, or to center of mass (COM) acceleration? This question has been debated in various forms for decades. However, it actually presents a false dichotomy, as these two possibilities are not mutually exclusive. If we ask either question independently, the answer is the same: yes! (1) Does ankle push-off primarily contribute to leg swing acceleration? Yes. (2) Does ankle push-off primarily contribute to COM acceleration? Yes. Here, we summarize the historical debate, then synthesize the seemingly polarized perspectives and demonstrate that both descriptions are valid. The principal means by which ankle push-off affects COM mechanics is by a localized action that increases the speed and kinetic energy of the trailing push-off limb. Because the limb is included in body COM computations, this localized segmental acceleration also accelerates the COM, and most of the segmental energy change also appears as COM energy change. Interpretation of ankle mechanics should abandon an either/or contrast of leg swing versus COM acceleration. Instead, ankle push-off should be interpreted in light of both mutually consistent effects. This unified perspective informs our fundamental understanding of the role of ankle push-off, and has important implications for the design of clinical interventions (e.g. prostheses, orthoses) intended to restore locomotor function to individuals with disabilities.
© 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bipedal walking; Double support; Gait analysis; Joint kinetics; Leg swing; Work and energy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27903626      PMCID: PMC5201006          DOI: 10.1242/jeb.140376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  76 in total

1.  Calf muscle work and segment energy changes in human treadmill walking.

Authors:  A L Hof; J Nauta; E R van der Knaap; M A Schallig; D P Struwe
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.368

2.  Muscle-tendon interaction and elastic energy usage in human walking.

Authors:  Masaki Ishikawa; Paavo V Komi; Michael J Grey; Vesa Lepola; Gert-Peter Bruggemann
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2005-04-21

Review 3.  Energetic consequences of walking like an inverted pendulum: step-to-step transitions.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo; J Maxwell Donelan; Andy Ruina
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.230

4.  The evolution of clinical gait analysis part III--kinetics and energy assessment.

Authors:  D H Sutherland
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  The history of gait analysis before the advent of modern computers.

Authors:  Richard Baker
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Analysis of instantaneous energy of normal gait.

Authors:  D A Winter; A O Quanbury; G D Reimer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Improved agreement of foot segmental power and rate of energy change during gait: inclusion of distal power terms and use of three-dimensional models.

Authors:  K L Siegel; T M Kepple; G E Caldwell
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  The effect of ankle foot orthosis stiffness on the energy cost of walking: a simulation study.

Authors:  D J J Bregman; M M van der Krogt; V de Groot; J Harlaar; M Wisse; S H Collins
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 9.  The six determinants of gait and the inverted pendulum analogy: A dynamic walking perspective.

Authors:  Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  External, internal and total work in human locomotion.

Authors:  P A Willems; G A Cavagna; N C Heglund
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  32 in total

1.  Differential activation of lumbar and sacral motor pools during walking at different speeds and slopes.

Authors:  A H Dewolf; Y P Ivanenko; K E Zelik; F Lacquaniti; P A Willems
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Biomechanical mechanisms underlying exosuit-induced improvements in walking economy after stroke.

Authors:  Jaehyun Bae; Louis N Awad; Andrew Long; Kathleen O'Donnell; Katy Hendron; Kenneth G Holt; Terry D Ellis; Conor J Walsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Intuitive Clinician Control Interface for a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis: A Case Study.

Authors:  David Quintero; Emma Reznick; Daniel J Lambert; Siavash Rezazadeh; Leslie Gray; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2018-11-23       Impact factor: 3.316

4.  Ankle power biofeedback attenuates the distal-to-proximal redistribution in older adults.

Authors:  Michael G Browne; Jason R Franz
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 5.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Tegotae-Based Control Produces Adaptive Inter- and Intra-limb Coordination in Bipedal Walking.

Authors:  Dai Owaki; Shun-Ya Horikiri; Jun Nishii; Akio Ishiguro
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Automated analysis of medial gastrocnemius muscle-tendon junction displacements in heathy young adults during isolated contractions and walking using deep neural networks.

Authors:  Rebecca L Krupenevich; Callum J Funk; Jason R Franz
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 7.027

8.  The impact of ankle-foot-orthosis (AFO) use on the compensatory stepping response required to avoid a fall during trip-like perturbations in young adults: Implications for AFO prescription and design.

Authors:  Masood Nevisipour; Claire F Honeycutt
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Effect of toe joint stiffness and toe shape on walking biomechanics.

Authors:  Eric C Honert; Gerasimos Bastas; Karl E Zelik
Journal:  Bioinspir Biomim       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.956

10.  Torque Curve Optimization of Ankle Push-Off in Walking Bipedal Robots Using Genetic Algorithm.

Authors:  Qiaoli Ji; Zhihui Qian; Lei Ren; Luquan Ren
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.