Literature DB >> 9142611

A peer review feedback method of promoting compliance with preventive care guidelines in a resident ambulatory care clinic.

L J Goebel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simple distribution of clinical practice guidelines to physicians does not change practice behavior. A low-cost, continuous peer review feedback method was used to promote resident physicians' compliance with nine preventive care guidelines at the ambulatory care clinic at the Marshall University School of Medicine (Huntington, West Virginia).
METHODS: Preventive care guidelines were distributed and a peer review feedback program was instituted in the resident physician primary care practice. The frequency of resident physician use of nine preventive care services was assessed and compared during three periods: preguideline (September 1, 1993, to March 1, 1994; 148 patients), guideline (September 1, 1994, to March 1, 1995; 148 patients), and one-year follow-up (September 1, 1995, to March 1, 1996; 150 patients). The patients in the three periods were similar in age, gender, and risk for influenza and pneumococcal infection.
RESULTS: During the guideline period, resident physicians offered patients four preventive care services-tetanus toxoid immunization, clinical breast examination, Papanicolaou smear testing, and hemoccult testing significantly more often than during the preguideline period. All services were offered significantly more often during the one-year follow-up period compared with the preguideline period and as often as in the guideline period.
CONCLUSION: A low-cost, continuous peer review feedback program significantly and durably improves resident physician compliance with clinical practice guidelines on preventive care services. However, the effectiveness of the poor review feedback method may not generalize to private practice or other settings. Research on other methods to promote compliance with clinical practice guidelines and to influence physician behavior in general should continue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142611     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30309-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  12 in total

1.  Differences in preventive health quality by residency year. Is seniority better?

Authors:  Lisa L Willett; Katri Palonen; Jeroan J Allison; Gustavo R Heudebert; Catarina I Kiefe; F Stanford Massie; Terry C Wall; Thomas K Houston
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites.

Authors:  Leonard Bickman; Susan R Douglas; Ana Regina Vides De Andrade; Michele Tomlinson; Alissa Gleacher; Serene Olin; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

Review 3.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

4.  Effect of Physician Notification Regarding Nonadherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening on Patient Participation in Fecal Immunochemical Test Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Cédric Rat; Corinne Pogu; Delphine Le Donné; Chloé Latour; Gaelle Bianco; France Nanin; Anne Cowppli-Bony; Aurélie Gaultier; Jean-Michel Nguyen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Implementing a Measurement Feedback System in Community Mental Health Clinics: A Case Study of Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Alissa A Gleacher; Serene S Olin; Erum Nadeem; Michele Pollock; Vanesa Ringle; Leonard Bickman; Susan Douglas; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

6.  Clinicians and outcome measurement: what's the use?

Authors:  Ann F Garland; Marc Kruse; Gregory A Aarons
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.505

7.  Using Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Any Treatment.

Authors:  Kelli Scott; Cara C Lewis
Journal:  Cogn Behav Pract       Date:  2015-02

8.  Designing tailored Web-based instruction to improve practicing physicians' preventive practices.

Authors:  Linda L Casebeer; Sheryl M Strasser; Claire M Spettell; Terry C Wall; Norman Weissman; Midge N Ray; Jeroan J Allison
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Lack of chart reminder effectiveness on family medicine resident JNC-VI and NCEP III guideline knowledge and attitudes.

Authors:  Paul S Echlin; Ross E G Upshur; Tsveti P Markova
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2004-07-05       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 10.  Is feedback to medical learners associated with characteristics of improved patient care?

Authors:  Victoria Hayes; Robert Bing-You; Kalli Varaklis; Robert Trowbridge; Heather Kemp; Dina McKelvy
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2017-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.