Literature DB >> 9137173

Intervertebral disc replacement. Experimental study.

J P Kostuik1.   

Abstract

Arthrodesis of the lumbosacral spine, although satisfactory for a majority of patients, has long term sequelae in 30% of patients. This is particularly true for adjacent segment degeneration. Numerous attempts at providing a mobile motion segment have been made in the past. The current status of the development of dynamic intervertebral prosthesis, including biomechanical and clinical data have been presented. The relevant material properties of plastics, ceramics, and metal are presented with the conclusion that metals currently present with the greatest longevity without undue fatigue and wear as many as 100,000,000 cycles (40 years use) as an alternative to spinal fusion. An analysis of the kinematics of the motion segment have resulted, together with the material properties in the development of a dynamic intervertebral disc for use in the lumbar spine. The disc resembles a normal motion segment. In motion stiffness and center of rotation, wear debris development in 1/300 equivalent to that of a total hip prosthesis for the same given time. Safety features include immediate screw fixation to prevent displacement, a wedge elastic (spring) shape, and a bony porous ingrowth surface. The prosthesis is constructed of cobalt chromium and titanium with minimal corrosive properties on long term testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9137173     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199704000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance.

Authors:  Christoph J Siepe; Karsten Wiechert; Mohamed F Khattab; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-05       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multidirectional flexibility analysis of anterior and posterior lumbar artificial disc reconstruction: in vitro human cadaveric spine model.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Kotani; Bryan W Cunningham; Kuniyoshi Abumi; Anton E Dmitriev; Niabin Hu; Manabu Ito; Yasuo Shikinami; Paul C McAfee; Akio Minami
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Design concepts in lumbar total disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Chiara M Bellini; Thomas Zweig; Stephen Ferguson; Manuela T Raimondi; Claudio Lamartina; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Maurizio Fornari
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion.

Authors:  Claire D Eliasberg; Michael P Kelly; Remi M Ajiboye; Nelson F SooHoo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Gene therapy approach for disc degeneration and associated spinal disorders.

Authors:  Kotaro Nishida; Teppei Suzuki; Kenichiro Kakutani; Takashi Yurube; Koichiro Maeno; Masahiro Kurosaka; Minoru Doita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  We Need to Talk about Lumbar Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Stephen Beatty
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

7.  Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons.

Authors:  Hassan Serhan; Devdatt Mhatre; Henri Defossez; Christopher M Bono
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2011-09-01

8.  Finite element study of matched paired posterior disc implant and dynamic stabilizer (360° motion preservation system).

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ali Kiapour; Ahmed Faizan; Manoj Krishna; Tai Friesem
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-02-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.