Literature DB >> 9134784

Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety.

K Mogg1, B P Bradley, J de Bono, M Painter.   

Abstract

A modified version of the probe detection task was used to investigate the effect of stimulus exposure duration on attentional bias for threat stimuli in a non-clinical sample of subjects. Stimulus duration was manipulated in order to examine different components of the anxiety-related attentional bias, i.e. initial orienting versus maintenance of attention to threat. Word pairs were presented on a computer screen for 100, 500 or 1,500 msec, and immediately after the termination of the display of each pair, a dot probe appeared in the position of one of the words. Higher levels of state anxiety were associated with faster response latencies for probes that replaced threat words, rather than neutral words (i.e. attentional vigilance for threat). This bias was not significantly affected by the exposure duration of the word stimuli. Thus, the attentional bias for threat does not appear to vary significantly over this range (100-1,500 msec) in non-clinical anxiety; it is recommended that the time course of the attentional bias be investigated further in clinical anxiety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9134784     DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00109-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  88 in total

1.  Capturing and holding attention: the impact of emotional words in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Karen J Mathewson; Karen M Arnell; Craig A Mansfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

2.  Fear of negative evaluation and the hypervigilance-avoidance hypothesis: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Matthias J Wieser; Paul Pauli; Peter Weyers; Georg W Alpers; Andreas Mühlberger
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  The neural correlates of attentional bias in blood phobia as revealed by the N2pc.

Authors:  Giulia Buodo; Michela Sarlo; Marianna Munafò
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  The beneficial effects of a positive attention bias amongst children with a history of psychosocial deprivation.

Authors:  Sonya Troller-Renfree; Katie A McLaughlin; Margaret A Sheridan; Charles A Nelson; Charles H Zeanah; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Phenomenological Characteristics of Attentional Biases Towards Threat: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Amy K Bacon; Nathan L Williams
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2009-04

6.  The relation between electroencephalogram asymmetry and attention biases to threat at baseline and under stress.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Autumn Kujawa; S Katherine Nelson; Claire Cole; Daniel J Zapp
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

8.  Viewing social scenes: a visual scan-path study comparing fragile X syndrome and Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Tracey A Williams; Melanie A Porter; Robyn Langdon
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-08

9.  Threats, rewards, and attention deployment in anxious youth and adults: An eye tracking study.

Authors:  Tomer Shechner; Johanna M Jarcho; Stuart Wong; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Eric E Nelson
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.251

10.  The impact of worry on attention to threat.

Authors:  Desmond J Oathes; Christian M Squillante; William J Ray; Jack B Nitschke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.