Literature DB >> 20622985

Phenomenological Characteristics of Attentional Biases Towards Threat: A Critical Review.

Josh M Cisler1, Amy K Bacon, Nathan L Williams.   

Abstract

Although research has consistently revealed the presence of a general attentional bias towards threat, empirical and theoretical ambiguity exists in determining whether attentional biases are comprised of facilitated attention to threat, difficulty in disengagement from threat, or both, as well as whether attentional biases reflect automatic or strategic processes. This paper reviews empirical investigations across 4 common assessment tasks: the Stroop (masked and unmasked), dot probe, visual search, and the Posner tasks. Although the review finds inconsistencies both within and between assessment tasks, the evidence suggests that attentional biases towards threat are comprised of each of the phenomenological characteristics addressed in this paper. Contemporary theoretical models of attentional biases in anxiety are summarized and critically reviewed in light of the current evidence. Suggestions for future research are addressed, including a need to investigate the psychometric properties of the assessment tasks, to utilize consistent theoretically driven operationalizations of attentional biases, and to provide a temporal description of the characteristics of attentional biases towards threat.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20622985      PMCID: PMC2901130          DOI: 10.1007/s10608-007-9161-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognit Ther Res        ISSN: 0147-5916


  59 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of the emotional stroop task: examining the paradox of measurement change.

Authors:  P Eide; A Kemp; R B Silberstein; P J Nathan; C Stough
Journal:  J Psychol       Date:  2002-09

2.  A rational look at the emotional stroop phenomenon: a generic slowdown, not a stroop effect.

Authors:  Daniel Algom; Eran Chajut; Shlomo Lev
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2004-09

3.  Looking for foes and friends: perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd.

Authors:  Pernilla Juth; Daniel Lundqvist; Andreas Karlsson; Arne Ohman
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2005-12

4.  Attentional bias in emotional disorders.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews; P Tata
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1986-02

5.  Anxiety and the allocation of attention to threat.

Authors:  C MacLeod; A Mathews
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1988-11

6.  Exposure to disgust-evoking imagery and information processing biases in blood-injection-injury phobia.

Authors:  C N Sawchuk; J M Lohr; T C Lee; D F Tolin
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1999-03

7.  A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.

Authors:  Claus Bundesen; Thomas Habekost; Soren Kyllingsbaek
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures.

Authors:  J Yiend; A Mathews
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-08

9.  Preconscious processing bias in specific phobia.

Authors:  M van den Hout; N Tenney; K Huygens; P de Jong
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1997-01

10.  Processing threatening information in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  R A Bryant; A G Harvey
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1995-08
View more
  64 in total

1.  Attention bias towards negative emotional information and its relationship with daily worry in the context of acute stress: An eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Richard J Macatee; Brian J Albanese; Norman B Schmidt; Jesse R Cougle
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2016-12-18

2.  Single-session attention bias modification and error-related brain activity.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Felicia Jackson; Nader Amir; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The effects of DBH, MAOA, and MAOB on attentional biases for facial expressions.

Authors:  Pingyuan Gong; Shoumin Xi; Guomin Shen; She Li; Peizhe Zhang; Guochang Cao; Fuchang Zhang; Yan Shen; Tiantian Feng; Hua Ma
Journal:  J Mol Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.444

4.  Body Dissatisfaction in Early Adolescence: The Coactive Roles of Cognitive and Sociocultural Factors.

Authors:  Jessica F Saunders; Leslie D Frazier
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-09-12

Review 5.  A systematic review of attentional biases in disorders involving binge eating.

Authors:  Monika Stojek; Lisa M Shank; Anna Vannucci; Diana M Bongiorno; Eric E Nelson; Andrew J Waters; Scott G Engel; Kerri N Boutelle; Daniel S Pine; Jack A Yanovski; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 6.  Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: a meta-analytic review and synthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Armstrong; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-09-20

7.  Attention bias modification reduces neural correlates of response monitoring.

Authors:  Brady D Nelson; Felicia Jackson; Nader Amir; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 8.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

Review 9.  Reward devaluation: Dot-probe meta-analytic evidence of avoidance of positive information in depressed persons.

Authors:  E Samuel Winer; Taban Salem
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: evidence for difficulty in disengagement.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Bunmi O Olatunji
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2009-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.