Literature DB >> 9133406

Response modulation in the zebra finch neostriatum: relationship to nuclear gene regulation.

R Stripling1, S F Volman, D F Clayton.   

Abstract

The sound of birdsong activates robust gene expression in the caudomedial neostriatum (NCM) of songbirds. To assess the function of this genomic response, we analyzed the temporal and quantitative relationships between electrophysiological activity and gene induction. Single units in zebra finch NCM showed large increases in firing in response to birdsong, whereas simple auditory tones tended to inhibit firing. Most cells showed little selectivity for individual songs based on total number of spikes produced. When a novel song stimulus was repeated, the cells rapidly modulated their firing rates so that the first response to a stimulus was markedly higher than consecutive responses. Even after many repetitions of a particular song, cells continued to fire in response to that stimulus, unlike the complete "habituation" observed previously for genomic activity. The initial modulation of the response to a particular song disappeared, however, once that song was repeated for 200 trials ( approximately 34 min). These results indicate a dissociation between gross physiological activity and "immediate early" gene expression: genomic activity occurs only during a subset of electrophysiological responses. We propose a model in which nuclear responses in NCM are modulated by pathways distinct from the primary auditory inputs to NCM. This would account for the changing selectivity of the genomic response and implies an active role for the cell nucleus as an integrating agent in the physiological operation of neural circuits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9133406      PMCID: PMC6573686     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  33 in total

1.  Feature extraction and tonotopic organization in the avian auditory forebrain.

Authors:  C M Müller; H J Leppelsack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional organization of some auditory nuclei in the guinea fowl demonstrated by the 2-deoxyglucose technique.

Authors:  H Scheich; B A Bonke; D Bonke; G Langner
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 5.249

3.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius.

Authors:  F Nottebohm; T M Stokes; C M Leonard
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1976-02-15       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Quantitative assessment of song-selectivity in the zebra finch "high vocal center".

Authors:  S F Volman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  The cAMP-responsive element in the corticotropin-releasing hormone gene mediates transcriptional regulation by depolarization.

Authors:  H M Guardiola-Diaz; C Boswell; A F Seasholtz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-05-20       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Opioids modulate stress-induced proenkephalin gene expression in the hypothalamus of transgenic mice: a model of endogenous opioid gene regulation by exogenous opioids.

Authors:  D Borsook; O Falkowski; H Rosen; M Comb; S E Hyman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Synaptotagmin IV is an immediate early gene induced by depolarization in PC12 cells and in brain.

Authors:  L Vician; I K Lim; G Ferguson; G Tocco; M Baudry; H R Herschman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Involvement of subcortical and cortical afferents to the lateral nucleus of the amygdala in fear conditioning measured with fear-potentiated startle in rats trained concurrently with auditory and visual conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  S Campeau; M Davis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Emotional memory systems in the brain.

Authors:  J E LeDoux
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1993-12-20       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Fos family members successively occupy the tyrosine hydroxylase gene AP-1 site after nerve growth factor or epidermal growth factor stimulation and can repress transcription.

Authors:  E Gizang-Ginsberg; E B Ziff
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1994-02
View more
  66 in total

1.  Singing in the brain.

Authors:  P Marler; A J Doupe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types.

Authors:  R Mooney; W Hoese; S Nowicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Short-term and long-term effects of vocal distortion on song maintenance in zebra finches.

Authors:  Gerald E Hough; Susan F Volman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  A framework for integrating the songbird brain.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; V A Smith; K Wada; M V Rivas; M McElroy; T V Smulders; P Carninci; Y Hayashizaki; F Dietrich; X Wu; P McConnell; J Yu; P P Wang; A J Hartemink; S Lin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Experimental analysis of the processes of systems genesis: expression of the c-fos gene in the chick brain during treatments inducing the development of the species-specific results-of-action acceptor.

Authors:  O V Egorova; K V Anokhin
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-03

6.  Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird.

Authors:  D L Maney; E A MacDougall-Shackleton; S A MacDougall-Shackleton; G F Ball; T P Hahn
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 7.  Songbirds and the revised avian brain nomenclature.

Authors:  Anton Reiner; David J Perkel; Claudio V Mello; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium.

Authors:  N Amin; J A Grace; F E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Functional differences in forebrain auditory regions during learned vocal recognition in songbirds.

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner; Stewart H Hulse; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Noninvasive diffusive optical imaging of the auditory response to birdsong in the zebra finch.

Authors:  James V Lee; Edward L Maclin; Kathy A Low; Gabriele Gratton; Monica Fabiani; David F Clayton
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 1.836

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.