Literature DB >> 8667295

Quantitative assessment of song-selectivity in the zebra finch "high vocal center".

S F Volman1.   

Abstract

1. Auditory responses in the zebra finch (Taenopygia guttata) song-system nucleus HVc were assessed at 54 recording sites by 3 different methods: discriminated action potentials; excitatory summed responses; and excitatory minus inhibitory summed responses. Four standard stimuli were presented at each site: the bird's own song; this song reversed; a conspecific song; and a noise burst. Responses were quantified by calculating a relative response index that partitoned the response, to provide a response profile, across the stimuli. 2. Regardless of analysis method, the strongest response was most often to the bird's own song (78-82%, depending on method). The predominant rank order of response strength across the remaining three stimuli was conspecific song > reversed song > noise. 3. The distribution of relative response magnitude was sensitive to analysis method. Discriminated spikes captured the heterogeneity of HVc neurons, whereas the excitatory summed responses reflected. the overall trends more consistently. When inhibition was subtracted from excitation in the summed responses, the variance of the relative responses increased, but this method presented some problems for statistical analysis. 4. A small sample of neurons in other forebrain auditory areas was used for comparative analyses. At these recording sites, the bird's own song did not consistently elicit the best response and there were generally smaller differences in the relative responses to the four stimuli. The smaller degree of stimulus selectivity among these cells resulted in less sensitivity to differences in the assessment methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8667295     DOI: 10.1007/bf00225832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  24 in total

1.  Gustatory sensitivities in neurons of the hamster nucleus tractus solitarius.

Authors:  J B Travers; D V Smith
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-03

2.  Auditory responses in the zebra finch's motor system for song.

Authors:  L C Katz; M E Gurney
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1981-09-21       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of songbird forebrain neurons to temporal order.

Authors:  M S Lewicki; M Konishi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Parallel pathways and convergence onto HVc and adjacent neostriatum of adult zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).

Authors:  E S Fortune; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1995-09-25       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 5.  Distributed representation in the song system of oscines: evolutionary implications and functional consequences.

Authors:  D Margoliash; E S Fortune; M L Sutter; A C Yu; B D Wren-Hardin; A Dave
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Sex differences in dendritic morphology of a song control nucleus in the canary: a quantitative Golgi study.

Authors:  T J DeVoogd; F Nottebohm
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1981-02-20       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius.

Authors:  F Nottebohm; T M Stokes; C M Leonard
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1976-02-15       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Projections of a telencephalic auditory nucleus-field L-in the canary.

Authors:  D B Kelley; F Nottebohm
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1979-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Setting complex tasks to single units in the avian auditory forebrain. I: Processing of complex artificial stimuli.

Authors:  M Knipschild; G J Dörrscheidt; R Rübsamen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Cytoarchitectonic organization and morphology of cells of the field L complex in male zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata).

Authors:  E S Fortune; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1992-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  20 in total

1.  Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system.

Authors:  P Janata; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Different subthreshold mechanisms underlie song selectivity in identified HVc neurons of the zebra finch.

Authors:  R Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types.

Authors:  R Mooney; W Hoese; S Nowicki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Contributions of tutor and bird's own song experience to neural selectivity in the songbird anterior forebrain.

Authors:  M M Solis; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Neural response to bird's own song and tutor song in the zebra finch field L and caudal mesopallium.

Authors:  N Amin; J A Grace; F E Theunissen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-04-03       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Song selectivity in the pallial-basal ganglia song circuit of zebra finches raised without tutor song exposure.

Authors:  Satoshi Kojima; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Neural encoding of auditory temporal context in a songbird basal ganglia nucleus, and its independence of birds' song experience.

Authors:  Satoshi Kojima; Allison J Doupe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus HVc of male zebra finches.

Authors:  F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Anterior forebrain neurons develop selectivity by an intermediate stage of birdsong learning.

Authors:  M M Solis; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Auditory-vocal mirroring in songbirds.

Authors:  Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.