Literature DB >> 9132497

Genetic counselling: the psychological impact of meeting patients' expectations.

S Michie1, T M Marteau, M Bobrow.   

Abstract

We know little about patients' expectations of genetic counselling, the extent to which these are met, and whether meeting expectations is associated with improved patient outcome. This study describes 131 consultations of patients referred to a regional genetics centre, and documents their expectations, the extent to which these are met, and the predictors and consequences of expectations being met. The outcomes assessed were state anxiety, concern about the problem for which the patient was referred, and satisfaction with information given. Patients came to genetic counselling expecting information (79%), explanation (63%), reassurance (50%), advice (50%), and help in making decisions (30%). The majority got what they were expecting: 74% had their expectation for information met, 56% had their expectation for explanation met, 60% had their expectation for reassurance met, 61% had their expectation for advice met, and 73% had their expectation for help with making decisions met. Patient expectations, and whether or not these were met, were not predicted by any of the patient or counsellor variables measured. When patients' expectations for reassurance and advice were met, patients were less concerned and their anxiety level was more reduced than when such expectations were not met. Meeting patients' expectations for information, explanation, or help with decision making were not associated with better outcomes. Explanations for these results and implications for the practice of genetic counselling are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9132497      PMCID: PMC1050900          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.34.3.237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  15 in total

Review 1.  The patient satisfaction process: moving toward a comprehensive model.

Authors:  S Strasser; L Aharony; D Greenberger
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1993

Review 2.  Physician-patient satisfaction: equity in the health services encounter.

Authors:  W F Koehler; M D Fottler; J E Swan
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1992

3.  Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study.

Authors:  S Michie; F Bron; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Patient-centredness in the consultation. 2: Does it really make a difference?

Authors:  R J Henbest; M Stewart
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 6.  Genetic counseling.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Doctor-patient communication.

Authors:  B M Korsch; V F Negrete
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.142

8.  Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients.

Authors:  C G Blanchard; M S Labrecque; J C Ruckdeschel; E B Blanchard
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI).

Authors:  T M Marteau; H Bekker
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-09

10.  Principle agendas of doctors and patients in general practice consultations.

Authors:  P D Campion; N M Butler; A D Cox
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  29 in total

1.  The whole truth and nothing but the truth, but what is the truth?

Authors:  H M van den Boer-van den Berg; A A Maat-Kievit
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Patricia McCarthy Veach; Sarah E Truesdell; Bonnie S LeRoy; Dianne M Bartels
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Is informed choice in genetic testing a different breed of informed decision-making? A discussion paper.

Authors:  J Emery
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.

Authors:  Angela Davey; Kristie Rostant; Karen Harrop; Jack Goldblatt; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Does and should breast cancer genetic counselling include lifestyle advice?

Authors:  Akke Albada; Madelèn Vernooij; Liesbeth van Osch; Anouk Pijpe; Sandra van Dulmen; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Concerns of South Korean patients and family members affected with genetic conditions: a content analysis of internet website messages.

Authors:  Heejung Kang; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Bonnie S Leroy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  The Role of Expectations in Effective Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  L R Jay; W A Afifi; W Samter
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  The Client's Perspective of Genetic Counseling-A Grounded Theory Study.

Authors:  H Skirton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetic Counseling: Clinical Geneticists' Views.

Authors:  S Michie; J A Smith; J Heaversedge; S Read
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  What counts as effective genetic counselling for presymptomatic testing in late-onset disorders? A study of the consultand's perspective.

Authors:  Lídia Guimarães; Jorge Sequeiros; Heather Skirton; Milena Paneque
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.