Literature DB >> 9132210

Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry.

H Tropp1, K Samuelsson, L Jorfeldt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The limiting factors with regard to power output available for wheelchair ambulation have not been identified. The aim of the present study was to correlate power output during wheelchair driving with (i) power output and oxygen uptake during arm crank ergometry and (ii) arm muscle strength.
METHODS: Eleven disabled men were examined for maximal power output (POmax) during wheelchair driving on a treadmill and during arm crank ergometry. Oxygen uptake (VO2) was recorded at submaximal and maximal arm crank ergometry in all men and during submaximal wheelchair driving on a treadmill in four men. Power output during wheelchair driving on a treadmill was measured. Static and dynamic elbow muscle strength was measured isokinetically.
RESULTS: POmax was significantly lower (P < 0.001) for wheelchair driving (109 (31) W; mean (SD)) than for arm ergometry (163 (49) W). There was a significant correlation between POmax for arm crank ergometry and wheelchair driving (r = 0.73). There was no correlation between POmax and elbow strength. The mechanical efficiency was constant for the different levels on the arm crank ergometry test. The submaximal testing showed a consistently lower mechanical efficiency for wheelchair driving than for arm crank ergometry.
CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that the lower level of power output for wheelchair driving is fully explained by the lower mechanical efficiency. Any improvement in power output available for ambulation must be based on wheelchair ergonomics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9132210      PMCID: PMC1332474          DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  17 in total

1.  Physical work capacity and the effect of training on subjects with long-standing paraplegia.

Authors:  S Nilsson; P H Staff; E D Pruett
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1975

2.  Physiological effects of a sports rehabilitation program on cerebral palsied and post-poliomyelitic adolescents.

Authors:  O Bar-or; O Inbar; R Spira
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1976

3.  The effects of arm crank training on the physiological responses to submaximal wheelchair ergometry.

Authors:  D A Sedlock; R G Knowlton; P I Fitzgerald
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

4.  Effect of physical training on adolescents with severe motor handicaps.

Authors:  B Ekblom; A Lundberg
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Scand       Date:  1968-01

5.  Energy costs of propelling wheelchair at various speeds: cardiac response and effect on steering accuracy.

Authors:  G Hildebrandt; E D Voight; D Bahn; B Berendes; J Kröger
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Energy expenditure and heart rate in driving a wheel-chair ergometer.

Authors:  S O Brattgård; G Grimby; O Höök
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

7.  Metabolic and circulatory responses to wheelchair and arm crank exercise.

Authors:  M N Sawka; R M Glaser; S W Wilde; T C von Luhrte
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-11

8.  Wheelchair exercise performance of the young, middle-aged, and elderly.

Authors:  M N Sawka; R M Glaser; L L Laubach; O Al-Samkari; A G Suryaprasad
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1981-04

9.  A field test for the prediction of aerobic capacity in male paraplegics and quadraplegics.

Authors:  E C Rhodes; D C McKenzie; K D Coutts; A R Rogers
Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci       Date:  1981-12

10.  Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry.

Authors:  R M Glaser; M N Sawka; M F Brune; S W Wilde
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1980-06
View more
  6 in total

1.  Assessment of the ability of wheelchair subjects with spinal cord injury to perform a specific protocol of shoulder training: a pilot study.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Fabio Dellabiancia; Maria Vittoria Filippi; Elisa De Santis; Daniele Alpi; Paola Magrini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-07-14

Review 2.  Field-based physiological testing of wheelchair athletes.

Authors:  Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey; Christof A Leicht
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Aerobic capacity and peak power output of elite quadriplegic games players.

Authors:  V Goosey-Tolfrey; P Castle; N Webborn; T Abel
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-04-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Arm Crank and Wheelchair Ergometry Produce Similar Peak Oxygen Uptake but Different Work Economy Values in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Tom Tørhaug; Berit Brurok; Jan Hoff; Jan Helgerud; Gunnar Leivseth
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Comparison of Aerobic Performance Testing Protocols in Elite Male Wheelchair Basketball Players.

Authors:  Bartosz Molik; Andrzej Kosmol; Natalia Morgulec-Adamowicz; Judit Lencse-Mucha; Anna Mróz; Karol Gryko; Jolanta Marszałek
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Julia Kathrin Baumgart; Laura Gürtler; Gertjan Ettema; Øyvind Sandbakk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 3.078

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.