Literature DB >> 7380703

Physiological responses to maximal effort wheelchair and arm crank ergometry.

R M Glaser, M N Sawka, M F Brune, S W Wilde.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare physical work capacity (PWC), peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2), maximal pulmonary ventilation (VEmax), maximal heart rate (HRmax), and maximal blood lactate concentration (LAmax) for wheelchair ergometer (WERG) and arm crank ergometer (ACE) exercise. For this, wheelchair-dependent (n = 6) and able-bodied (n = 10) subjects completed a progressive intensity, discontinuous test for each mode of exercise. Each test was terminated by physical exhaustion and/or an inability to maintain a flywheel velocity of 180 m.min-1. Relatively high correlation coefficients were found between values obtained during the two modes of ergometry for PWC, peak VO2, VEmax, and HRmax. WERG exercise was found to elicit a significantly (P less than 0.05) lower PWC (by 36%), HRmax (by 7%), and LAmax (by 26%) than ACE exercise. Peak VO2 and VEmax, however, were similar for both exercise modes. These data suggest that either exercise mode may be used for fitness testing and training of people who cannot use their legs and that arm cranking may be a superior method to propel wheelchairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7380703     DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1980.48.6.1060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol        ISSN: 0161-7567


  22 in total

1.  Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry.

Authors:  H Tropp; K Samuelsson; L Jorfeldt
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Cardiovascular responses in paraplegic subjects during arm exercise.

Authors:  M T Hopman; B Oeseburg; R A Binkhorst
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Energy expenditure and metabolism during exercise in persons with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michael Price
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dale Lovell; Darron Shields; Belinda Beck; Ross Cuneo; Chris McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Differences in performance between trained and untrained subjects during a 30-s sprint test in a wheelchair ergometer.

Authors:  H E Veeger; E M Lute; K Roeleveld; L H van der Woude
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

6.  A physiological case study of a paralympic wheelchair tennis player: reflective practise.

Authors:  Nicholas J Diaper; Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-06-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 7.  Anaerobic fitness testing of wheelchair users.

Authors:  Y Hutzler
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  The effects of arm crank training on the physiological responses to submaximal wheelchair ergometry.

Authors:  D A Sedlock; R G Knowlton; P I Fitzgerald
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1988

9.  Comparison of treadmill exercise testing protocols for wheelchair users.

Authors:  G H Hartung; D A Lally; R J Blancq
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1993

Review 10.  Cardiorespiratory fitness and training in quadriplegics and paraplegics.

Authors:  M D Hoffman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.