Literature DB >> 9131237

Mechanical evaluation of mobile bearing knees.

P P Menchetti1, P S Walker.   

Abstract

To evaluate the mechanical behavior of a new mobile bearing knee prosthesis (MBK, Zimmer, Swindon, United Kingdom), two experimental studies were performed. In the first study, by superimposing a transparent template of the MBK on lateral radiographs taken in 15 normal cadaveric knees at 15 degrees intervals from 0 degree to 120 degrees of flexion, the displacement of the mobile bearing surface in respect to the tibial plateau was measured. By increasing the knee flexion, the mobile bearing surface moved progressively backward from an average value of 1.4 mm at 0 degree to an average value of 7 mm at 120 degrees of flexion. In the second study, by using pressure-sensitive Fujifilm, the contact pressure distribution across the upper and lower bearing surfaces of closely conforming mobile bearing knees was analyzed to determine if small differences in the relative radii of curvature resulted in pressure changes distribution. Five metal cylinders of different radii of curvature were used to reproduce the femoral components. For the femoral plastic bearing surface, the contact pressure distribution was uniform when there was an interference of 0.1 to 0.2 mm. For the plastic tibial plate bearing surface, uniform pressure was achieved for radii that were equal. The results of the first study indicate that the MBK prosthesis, retaining the posterior cruciate ligament and having no preferred axis of movement on its own, can follow the pattern of movement that the retained ligaments dictate. The second study confirms that between closely conforming surfaces, the pressure distribution is uniform, and small differences in the relative radii of curvature affect the pressure distribution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9131237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Knee Surg        ISSN: 0899-7403


  8 in total

1.  Kinematic analysis of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing knee prostheses by simulation.

Authors:  K Higashijima; A Ishida; Y Fukuoka; A Hoshino; H Minamitani
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Femoro-tibial kinematics after TKA in fixed- and mobile-bearing knees in the sagittal plane.

Authors:  Kiriakos Daniilidis; Steffen Höll; Georg Gosheger; Ralf Dieckmann; Nicolo Martinelli; Sven Ostermeier; Carsten O Tibesku
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [A new total knee arthroplasty with physiologically shaped surfaces. Part 2: First clinical results].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; H Nägerl; D Kubein-Meesenburg; J Buchholz; J Dörner; H Dathe; O Hellerer; C Dumont; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Radiostereometric measurement of polyethylene deformation pattern in meniscal bearing TKR at 5 years follow-up.

Authors:  Alessandro Russo; Laura Bragonzoni; Claudia Trozzi; Francesco Iacono; Andrea Visani; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement.

Authors:  M D Horwitz; S Awan; M B Chatoo; D J Stott; D P Powles
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  A Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results of Press Fit Condylar Rotating-Platform High-Flexion and Low Contact Stress Mobile Bearing Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Short term Results.

Authors:  Shin Woo Nam; Yong Seuk Lee; Ji Hoon Kwak; Nam Ki Kim; Beom Koo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-28

7.  Comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty in terms of patellofemoral pain and function: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial.

Authors:  P Z Feczko; L M Jutten; M J van Steyn; P Deckers; P J Emans; J J Arts
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Sung-Hwan Yoon; Jun-Shik Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.