Literature DB >> 9128965

Biological effect of pulsed dose rate brachytherapy with stepping sources if short half-times of repair are present in tissues.

J F Fowler1, E F Van Limbergen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the possible increase of radiation effect in tissues irradiated by pulsed brachytherapy (PDR) for local tissue dose rates between those "averaged over the whole pulse" and the instantaneous high dose rates close to the dwell positions. Increased effect is more likely for tissues with short half-times of repair of the order of a few minutes, similar to pulse durations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Calculations were done assuming the linear quadratic formula for radiation damage, in which only the dose-squared term is subject to exponential repair. The situation with two components of T1,2 is addressed. A constant overall time of 140 h and a constant total dose of 70 Gy were assumed throughout, the continuous low dose rate of 0.5 Gy/h (CLDR) providing the unitary standard effects for each PDR condition. Effects of dose rates ranging from 4 Gy/h to 120 Gy/h (HDR at 2 Gy/min) were studied, covering the gap in an earlier publication. Four schedules were examined: doses per pulse of 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 Gy given at repetiton frequencies of 1, 2, 3, and 4 h, respectively, each with a range of assumed half-times of repair of 4 min to 1.5 h. Results are presented for late-responding tissues, the differences from CLDR being two or three times greater than for early-responding tissues and most tumors.
RESULTS: Curves are presented relating the ratio of increased biological effect (proportional to log cell kill) calculated for PDR relative to CLDR. Ratios as high as 1.5 can be found for large doses per pulse (2 Gy) if the half-time of repair in tissues is as short as a few minutes. The major influences on effect are dose per pulse, half-time of repair in tissue, and--when T1/2 is short--the instantaneous dose rate. Maximum ratios of PDR/CLDR occur when the dose rate is such that pulse duration is approximately equal to T1/2. As dose rate in the pulse is increased, a plateau of effect is reached, for most T1/2s, above 10 to 20 Gy/h, which is therefore radiobiologically equivalent to the highest HDR. A stepping source of 1 curie carries a sphere of "HDR" of radius 20 mm with it in its track through tissue. High ratios of PDR/LDR effect can be avoided by keeping dose per pulse below 1 Gy.
CONCLUSIONS: Therefore, about 75% of the total dose is delivered at HDR in a PDR implant of moderate volume, reducing to 40% as the source decays from 1 to 0.3 curies. Even so, restricting the dose per pulse to 0.5 or 0.6 Gy should avoid ratios of increased effect larger than about 10%. It appears likely that PDR delivered by stepping source might behave more like HDR than LDR, especially for tissues with a substantial component of repair of very short T1/2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128965     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(96)00565-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  14 in total

Review 1.  A review of the clinical experience in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Brian V Balgobind; Kees Koedooder; Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga; Raquel Dávila Fajardo; Coen R N Rasch; Bradley R Pieters
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Biphasic and monophasic repair: comparative implications for biologically equivalent dose calculations in pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  W T Millar; J H Hendry; S E Davidson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Radiobiological considerations in combining doses from external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Ana M Tornero-López; Damián Guirado
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2018-07-02

Review 4.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  A Polo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Radiation repair models for clinical application.

Authors:  Roger G Dale
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Pulsed brachytherapy: a modelled consideration of repair parameter uncertainties and their influence on treatment duration extension and daytime-only "block-schemes".

Authors:  T S A Underwood; R G Dale; A M Bidmead; C A Nalder; P R Blake
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Radiation therapy in the management of the primary penile tumor: an update.

Authors:  Juanita Crook; Clement Ma; Laval Grimard
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  In vivo assessment of catheter positioning accuracy and prolonged irradiation time on liver tolerance dose after single-fraction 192Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Lutz Lüdemann; Christian Wybranski; Max Seidensticker; Konrad Mohnike; Siegfried Kropf; Peter Wust; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Biological equivalence between LDR and PDR in cervical cancer: multifactor analysis using the linear-quadratic model.

Authors:  José Guilherme Couto; Isabel Bravo; Rui Pirraco
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of lip cancer.

Authors:  Krystyna Serkies; Adam Ziemlewski; Tomasz Sawicki; Joanna Kamińska; Rafał Dziadziuszko
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2013-09-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.