Literature DB >> 9126818

The possibilities and limitations of nucleic acid amplification technology in diagnostic microbiology.

M Vaneechoutte1, J Van Eldere.   

Abstract

Nucleic acid amplification technology is examined from the critical viewpoint of a clinical microbiologist working in a routine diagnostic bacteriology laboratory. Widely recognised limitations of amplification technology include those of false-positive and false-negative results, the difficulty of obtaining quantitative results, the problem of using this technology for susceptibility testing, and the difficulty of detecting routinely the wide range of possible pathogens contained in a clinical sample. On the positive side, amplification technology brings welcome new possibilities for rapid detection of specific pathogens in a sample, including viruses, slowly growing bacteria, fastidious or uncultivable bacteria, fungi and protozoa. Other possible applications include screening normally sterile clinical samples for non-specific bacterial contamination and the use of amplification-based DNA fingerprinting methods for identification and typing of microorganisms. Nevertheless, it is predicted that-in contrast to research and reference facilities-routine bacteriology laboratories will continue to rely on culture as the preferred 'amplification method' for most diagnostic applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9126818     DOI: 10.1099/00222615-46-3-188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Microbiol        ISSN: 0022-2615            Impact factor:   2.472


  22 in total

1.  Molecular diagnosis of infections in the new millennium.

Authors:  N Press; M Romney; S Takaya; B Conway
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-11-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Investigating microbial (micro)colony heterogeneity by vibrational spectroscopy.

Authors:  L P Choo-Smith; K Maquelin; T van Vreeswijk; H A Bruining; G J Puppels; N A Ngo Thi; C Kirschner; D Naumann; D Ami; A M Villa; F Orsini; S M Doglia; H Lamfarraj; G D Sockalingum; M Manfait; P Allouch; H P Endtz
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  A plea for caution with regard to applicability of PCR for direct detection.

Authors:  M Vaneechoutte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?

Authors:  A J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Discrepant analysis is an inappropriate and unscientific method.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Direct genetic analysis by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  T J Griffin; J G Hall; J R Prudent; L M Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of DNA extraction methods for use in combination with SYBR green I real-time PCR to detect Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis in poultry.

Authors:  Dario De Medici; Luciana Croci; Elisabetta Delibato; Simona Di Pasquale; Emma Filetici; Laura Toti
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparison of PCR, electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and the standard culture method for detecting salmonella in meat products.

Authors:  Luciana Croci; Elisabetta Delibato; Giulia Volpe; Dario De Medici; Giuseppe Palleschi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Methodological Guidelines for Accurate Detection of Viruses in Wild Plant Species.

Authors:  Christelle Lacroix; Kurra Renner; Ellen Cole; Eric W Seabloom; Elizabeth T Borer; Carolyn M Malmstrom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Comparison of API 20E and invA PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica isolates from swine production units.

Authors:  Daniele M Nucera; Carol W Maddox; Patricia Hoien-Dalen; Ronald M Weigel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.