Literature DB >> 11142698

Discrepant analysis is an inappropriate and unscientific method.

A Hadgu.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2000        PMID： 11142698      PMCID： PMC87594          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.38.11.4301-4302.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Discrepant analysis: how can we test a test?

Authors:  A J McAdam
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Bias in discrepant analysis: when two wrongs don't make a right.

Authors:  W C Miller
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.

Authors:  T A Green; C M Black; R E Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Discrepant analysis--or behaviour?

Authors:  J Hilden
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-09-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Use of methodological standards in diagnostic test research. Getting better but still not good.

Authors:  M C Reid; M S Lachs; A R Feinstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B Van Der Pol; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos; K Crotchfelt; J Schachter; J Moncada; D Jungkind; D H Martin; B Turner; C Peyton; R B Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  The possibilities and limitations of nucleic acid amplification technology in diagnostic microbiology.

Authors:  M Vaneechoutte; J Van Eldere
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.472
  9 in total
  10 in total

Review 1.  Testing specimens for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  S Skidmore; P Horner; H Mallinson
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge.

Authors:  David M Whiley; John W Tapsall; Theo P Sloots
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Multicenter evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) test as a rapid screening method for detection of MRSA in nares.

Authors:  D M Wolk; E Picton; D Johnson; T Davis; P Pancholi; C C Ginocchio; S Finegold; D F Welch; M de Boer; D Fuller; M C Solomon; B Rogers; M S Mehta; L R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Streptococcus pyogenes by use of Illumigene group A Streptococcus assay.

Authors:  Amanda M Henson; Donna Carter; Kathleen Todd; Stanford T Shulman; Xiaotian Zheng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Validation of a next-generation sequencing assay for clinical molecular oncology.

Authors:  Catherine E Cottrell; Hussam Al-Kateb; Andrew J Bredemeyer; Eric J Duncavage; David H Spencer; Haley J Abel; Christina M Lockwood; Ian S Hagemann; Stephanie M O'Guin; Lauren C Burcea; Christopher S Sawyer; Dayna M Oschwald; Jennifer L Stratman; Dorie A Sher; Mark R Johnson; Justin T Brown; Paul F Cliften; Bijoy George; Leslie D McIntosh; Savita Shrivastava; Tudung T Nguyen; Jacqueline E Payton; Mark A Watson; Seth D Crosby; Richard D Head; Robi D Mitra; Rakesh Nagarajan; Shashikant Kulkarni; Karen Seibert; Herbert W Virgin; Jeffrey Milbrandt; John D Pfeifer
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 6.  Guidelines for Validation of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Oncology Panels: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology and College of American Pathologists.

Authors:  Lawrence J Jennings; Maria E Arcila; Christopher Corless; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Ira M Lubin; John Pfeifer; Robyn L Temple-Smolkin; Karl V Voelkerding; Marina N Nikiforova
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Diagnosis and assessment of trachoma.

Authors:  Anthony W Solomon; Rosanna W Peeling; Allen Foster; David C W Mabey
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Performance of four HRP-2/pLDH combination rapid diagnostic tests and field microscopy as screening tests for malaria in pregnancy in Indonesia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Rukhsana Ahmed; Elvira I Levy; Sylvia S Maratina; Judith J de Jong; Puji B S Asih; Ismail E Rozi; William Hawley; Din Syafruddin; Feiko ter Kuile
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Development and evaluation of real-time PCR assays for the detection of the newly identified KI and WU polyomaviruses.

Authors:  S Bialasiewicz; D M Whiley; S B Lambert; A Gould; M D Nissen; T P Sloots
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.168

10.  The evaluation of the utility of the GENECUBE HQ SARS-CoV-2 for anterior nasal samples and saliva samples with a new rapid examination protocol.

Authors:  Asami Naito; Yoshihiko Kiyasu; Yusaku Akashi; Akio Sugiyama; Masashi Michibuchi; Yuto Takeuchi; Shigeyuki Notake; Koji Nakamura; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Hiromichi Suzuki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.